Oppo Reno10 Pro vs Realme GT Neo 5 240W: Which Flagship Offers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a more balanced experience, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers a performance edge, and the groundbreaking 240W charging significantly reduces downtime, outweighing the Reno10 Pro's efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Realme GT Neo 5 240W |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PHV110 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 8200)
- Potentially better camera image processing (Oppo's expertise)
- Balanced overall experience
- Slower charging speed (100W vs 240W)
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is superior)
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially lower battery life due to more power-hungry chipset
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Realme GT Neo 5's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will handle graphically intensive tasks with greater ease. The Reno10 Pro's Dimensity 8200, built on a 4nm process, will be more efficient, potentially leading to longer screen-on times, but at the cost of peak graphical performance. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but Realme often prioritizes vibrant colors, while Oppo leans towards more natural calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Reno10 Pro, as part of the Oppo family, likely benefits from Oppo’s established image processing algorithms and potentially a more refined camera experience. The GT Neo 5, while capable, may prioritize speed and features over image quality finesse. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Reno10 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a stronger emphasis on photography.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5’s Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is the clear performance leader. Its Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a significant advantage over the Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture, with its three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.75 GHz, is designed for sustained high performance, while the Dimensity 8200 relies on three Cortex-A78 cores at 3.0 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of both chips is comparable, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimization and thermal management expertise. This translates to better gaming performance and faster processing speeds for demanding applications on the GT Neo 5.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5’s 240W charging is the defining feature. Achieving a 50% charge in just 4 minutes and a full charge in 10 minutes is a game-changer, drastically reducing downtime. While the Reno10 Pro’s 100W charging is still fast (50% in 9 minutes), it pales in comparison. The actual battery capacity (mAh) is unknown for both devices, but the GT Neo 5’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage in battery size. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to be more power-hungry than the Dimensity 8200, but the GT Neo 5’s charging speed allows for quick top-ups, minimizing the impact of higher power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you need a phone with a focus on efficient power management and a potentially smoother everyday experience, prioritizing longevity over peak performance. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prefer uncompromising speed, incredibly fast charging, and are willing to trade some efficiency for a more powerful processor, especially if you're a heavy gamer or content creator.