The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China variant) and the Meizu 20 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive Android flagship space. While both aim for a premium experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in the chipset and charging technologies. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Meizu 20 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, especially in demanding tasks like gaming, and the inclusion of 50W wireless charging adds convenience. While the Reno10 Pro offers competitive 100W wired charging, it can't match the overall processing power of its rival.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, March 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, June 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| | - | IP54 |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Flyme 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 4.0 - 512GB |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
50 MP f/1.9, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.2, 129˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K, 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD3 PPS, QC4+
50W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Gray, Gold, Silver |
| Models | PHV110 | - |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Extremely fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point (China market)
- MediaTek Dimensity 8200 offers good all-around performance
- Lacks wireless charging
- Dimensity 8200 is outperformed by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- China-specific software may be a barrier for some users
Meizu 20 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 50W wireless charging for added convenience
- More globally-focused software experience
- 80W wired charging is slower than Reno10 Pro
- Potentially higher price
- Thermal throttling could be a concern under extreme load (though mitigated by Snapdragon optimizations)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their flagship positioning, both likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels. The Reno series historically focuses on vibrant colors, while Meizu often aims for color accuracy. The absence of LTPO information suggests potential differences in adaptive refresh rate efficiency, impacting battery life. Bezels are likely minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the flagship status of both devices suggests high-quality camera systems. The Meizu 20 Pro, benefiting from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior ISP, likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities. The Reno series often emphasizes portrait photography, while Meizu tends towards a more natural color profile. Sensor size and aperture are crucial factors not provided, but a larger sensor on either device would translate to better low-light performance. The absence of information on OIS is also a key omission.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 20 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 utilizes the newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offering superior single-core performance compared to the Dimensity 8200’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. The Snapdragon’s architecture (1+2+2+3) is also more efficient for sustained workloads. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations, resulting in better thermal management and reduced throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The Meizu 20 Pro will demonstrably outperform the Reno10 Pro in GPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Meizu 20 Pro offers a balanced approach with 80W wired charging (PD3 PPS, QC4+) and 50W wireless charging. The Oppo Reno10 Pro prioritizes wired charging speed with its 100W implementation (PD, QC3), but lacks wireless charging. While 100W is faster, the convenience of 50W wireless charging on the Meizu 20 Pro is a significant advantage for many users. The actual 0-100% charge times will depend on battery capacity (not provided), but the Reno10 Pro will likely achieve a full charge faster, while the Meizu 20 Pro offers more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you prioritize extremely fast wired charging and are comfortable with the China-specific software ecosystem. It’s a strong contender for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Meizu 20 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and resource-intensive applications, value wireless charging convenience, and prefer a more globally-focused software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8200 in the Oppo Reno10 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8200 is a capable chip, it will likely exhibit more noticeable frame drops and throttling in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Meizu 20 Pro. The Snapdragon's superior thermal management and GPU performance provide a smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the Meizu 20 Pro significantly slower than the 100W on the Oppo Reno10 Pro in real-world use?
The difference in charging speed isn't as dramatic as the wattage suggests. While the Reno10 Pro will initially charge faster, the charging curve flattens out as the battery fills. The Meizu 20 Pro's 80W charging, combined with its efficient power management, will likely result in a full charge within a comparable timeframe, especially considering the convenience of wireless charging.
❓ What software experience can I expect from each phone, considering the Oppo Reno10 Pro is a China-specific model?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro will likely ship with ColorOS, customized for the Chinese market, potentially lacking Google Mobile Services and offering a different app ecosystem. The Meizu 20 Pro, while also originating from China, generally offers a more international-friendly software experience with broader app compatibility and potentially Google Play Store support.
