Oppo Reno10 Pro vs Huawei P60 Art: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Design
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno10 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 offers comparable performance to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with significantly faster 100W charging. While the P60 Art boasts a distinctive design, the Reno10 Pro’s overall package provides a more compelling user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Huawei P60 Art |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 161 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.34 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1220 x 2700 pixels (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.7 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (International) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 48 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 25mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 90mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS, HDR Vivid |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR Vivid |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 88W wired 50W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Azure Blue, Seashore Gold |
| Models | PHV110 | MNA-AL00 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster 100W charging
- Potentially better thermal management with Dimensity 8200
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Chipset may have slightly lower peak single-core performance
- Camera system likely less refined than Huawei’s
Huawei P60 Art
- Unique and artistic design
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Slower charging speeds (88W wired, 50W wireless)
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 prone to throttling under load
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the flagship positioning, both likely feature high-refresh-rate OLED panels. The Huawei P60 Art’s ‘Art’ designation suggests a focus on color accuracy and potentially a more premium panel. The Reno10 Pro, being a more mainstream flagship, may prioritize refresh rate and brightness. Without specific nit ratings or PWM dimming frequencies, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the P60 Art’s branding hints at a potentially superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The P60 Art’s camera system is likely the more sophisticated of the two, given Huawei’s strong camera reputation. While specific sensor details are missing, the ‘Art’ branding suggests a focus on image quality and potentially larger sensors. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP is well-regarded for its image processing capabilities. The Reno10 Pro, while capable, likely prioritizes versatility over outright image quality. Without knowing the sensor sizes and lens apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Huawei’s history suggests a more refined camera experience. We can assume both phones will have capable main sensors, but the P60 Art likely has the edge in low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei P60 Art utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), while the Oppo Reno10 Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm). Both are 4nm chips, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.19 GHz) offers a slight theoretical advantage in single-core performance compared to the Reno10 Pro’s Cortex-A78 (3.1 GHz). However, the Dimensity 8200’s more efficient architecture and newer process refinements may translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to throttle under prolonged load, a potential issue the Dimensity 8200 could mitigate. Both devices likely pair their chipsets with ample RAM, but the Reno10 Pro’s potential for LPDDR5X RAM could provide a marginal speed boost.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 100W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a 50% charge in just 9 minutes. The Huawei P60 Art’s 88W wired charging and 50W wireless charging are respectable, but fall short of the Reno10 Pro’s speed. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Reno10 Pro effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Reno10 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the P60 Art, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you need blazing-fast charging, a modern processor with excellent efficiency, and prioritize value for money. Buy the Huawei P60 Art if you prefer a unique, artistic design language, and are willing to trade some charging speed and potentially software access for a distinctive aesthetic and a well-established camera system.