Oppo Reno10 Pro vs Honor 90 Pro: A Detailed Performance and Charging Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor 90 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming, while the 90W charging is competitive. The Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 is capable, but doesn’t quite match the raw power of Qualcomm’s offering.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Honor 90 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 74 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.4, 100˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 9 min Reverse wired | 90W wired, 3-56% in 15 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue |
| Models | PHV110 | REP-AN00 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset for everyday use.
- Slightly faster 0-50% charging speed (9 minutes).
- Oppo’s ColorOS software may appeal to some users.
- Dimensity 8200 chipset is outperformed by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in demanding tasks.
- Lacks the raw processing power for high-end gaming.
Honor 90 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers superior CPU and GPU performance.
- Faster 90W charging provides quick top-ups.
- More advanced ISP for improved image processing.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 may generate slightly more heat under sustained load.
- Honor’s MagicOS software may not be as refined as ColorOS for some users.
Display Comparison
While detailed display specs are missing, both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate OLED panels common in this price bracket. However, the chipset differences indirectly impact display performance. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 90 Pro has a more powerful GPU, potentially enabling smoother performance in graphically intensive games displayed on the screen. The 4nm process node of both chips suggests similar power efficiency in driving the displays, but the Snapdragon’s architectural advantages may still translate to slightly better sustained performance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Both phones likely feature capable main sensors, but the Honor 90 Pro’s chipset gives it an edge in computational photography and video recording. The Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 will still deliver good results, but may struggle to match the dynamic range and detail captured by the Honor 90 Pro in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 90 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This configuration is demonstrably more powerful than the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm), which uses a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.1 GHz, three Cortex-A78 performance cores at 3.0 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. The Snapdragon’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds on its performance cores translate to superior CPU and GPU performance, particularly in sustained workloads. The Dimensity 8200, while efficient, is a generation behind and will show its limitations in demanding games and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones offer fast charging, but with different implementations. The Honor 90 Pro’s 90W wired charging can replenish the battery from 3-56% in 15 minutes, offering a quick top-up. The Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 100W charging is slightly faster, reaching 50% in 9 minutes. However, the actual battery capacity isn’t specified, so it’s hard to determine which phone offers better overall battery life. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to be relatively power-efficient, potentially offsetting a slightly smaller battery capacity in the Honor 90 Pro. Both phones also offer 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience within the Oppo ecosystem and value a slightly more efficient chipset for everyday tasks. Buy the Honor 90 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and resource-intensive applications, and appreciate faster charging speeds to minimize downtime. The Honor 90 Pro is the better pick for power users.