Oppo Reno10 (China) vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset delivers significantly better performance, and its impressive 12:23h active use battery life outweighs the Reno10’s faster 80W charging. The Reno10 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a slightly more compact form factor and potentially lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 (China) | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PHW110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 330 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Faster 80W wired charging
- May have a more compact form factor
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Likely inferior battery life
- Limited display brightness information
Xiaomi 13T
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Brighter display (1264 nits)
- Slower 67W charging (42 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno10. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (like LTPO) are missing for the Reno10, suggesting a potentially less advanced display experience than the 13T.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Reno10 are unavailable, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Xiaomi 13T’s camera system is expected to be more versatile, benefiting from the processing power of the Dimensity 8200 Ultra. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Reno10’s image processing capabilities are likely less advanced. Without specific sensor details for the Reno10, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range compared to the 13T.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13T’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance leap over the Oppo Reno10’s 6nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. The Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – outpaces the Reno10’s 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The 4nm node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T demonstrates superior battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101h. While the Oppo Reno10’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T’s longevity is a significant advantage. The Reno10 compensates with 80W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes, while the 13T takes 42 minutes for a full charge with its 67W system. However, the 13T’s larger battery and efficient chipset mean you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 (China) if you prioritize a potentially more affordable price point and a slightly more manageable size for one-handed use. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you demand superior processing power for gaming and demanding applications, and value extended battery life for all-day use. The 13T is the clear choice for power users.