Oppo Reno10 (China) vs. vivo X90s: A Detailed Performance and Charging Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the vivo X90s is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset offers a substantial leap over the Reno10’s Snapdragon 778G, and the 120W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Reno10 remains a viable option for those seeking a more balanced package at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 (China) | vivo X90s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, June 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, June 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 4810 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, White, Red, Green |
| Models | PHW110 | V2241HA |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 510 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G for everyday tasks
- 80W fast charging with reverse wired support
- Significantly less powerful chipset than the X90s
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
- Likely less advanced camera system
vivo X90s
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9200+ performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (50% in 8 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system with advanced ISP
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run hotter under sustained load (though 4nm helps)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature OLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Reno10’s Snapdragon 778G will handle display tasks efficiently, but the X90s’ Dimensity 9200+ offers headroom for more complex visual processing, potentially resulting in smoother animations and faster app loading times. Without specific display specs like refresh rate or peak brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X90s’ superior chipset suggests a more responsive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X90s, positioned as a more premium device, likely incorporates a more advanced camera system. The Dimensity 9200+ also boasts a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling more complex image processing algorithms. While the Reno10 will likely produce acceptable images, the X90s is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and with dynamic range. The absence of sensor size data prevents a more granular analysis.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The vivo X90s’ Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, compared to the Oppo Reno10’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 9200+’s architecture – with its Cortex-A715 performance cores – provides a substantial advantage in multi-core performance and sustained workloads. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, leading to better thermal management under heavy load. Gamers and power users will unequivocally benefit from the X90s’ superior processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The charging speeds are a key battleground. The vivo X90s’ 120W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 8 minutes, a significant time saver. The Oppo Reno10’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes 11 minutes to reach the same 50% mark. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the X90s mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Both devices support reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and efficient performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are sensitive to price. Buy the vivo X90s if you prioritize demanding gaming, content creation, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the enhanced performance.