iQOO 11S vs Oppo Reno10: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the Oppo Reno10 offers a compelling value. However, the iQOO 11S is the clear winner for demanding users who prioritize raw performance, especially gaming, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and 200W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno10 (China) | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PHW110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Stylish design and build quality
- Capable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly less powerful than the iQOO 11S
- Slower charging speeds
- May struggle with demanding games
vivo iQOO 11S
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Superior thermal management
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May not offer significant camera improvements over Reno10
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Reno10, Oppo typically equips its Reno series with high-quality AMOLED panels. The iQOO 11S, though lacking detailed specs here, likely features a high refresh rate AMOLED. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. The Reno10's focus is likely on color science for social media, while the iQOO 11S may prioritize refresh rate for gaming. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the iQOO 11S, being a flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. The Reno10 will likely focus on computational photography and AI scene optimization. The iQOO 11S’s superior processing power allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of details on OIS for either device makes it impossible to assess stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a generational leap over the Reno10’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The iQOO 11S also benefits from a more efficient 4nm process, leading to better thermal management under sustained load. The Reno10’s 778G is still a capable chip, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at maximum settings. The iQOO 11S’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, offering faster data transfer speeds compared to the Reno10’s likely LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 configuration.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in under 20 minutes. The Reno10’s 80W charging is respectable, taking around 11 minutes to reach 50%, but falls far behind. While battery capacity isn't specified, the iQOO 11S’s more efficient chipset and optimized software likely mitigate the impact of potentially lower mAh. The Reno10 will rely more on its battery capacity for all-day use, while the iQOO 11S can quickly top up when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 (China) if you need a stylish, capable phone for daily use, social media, and light gaming, and value a more reasonable price point. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you prioritize maximum performance for demanding games, content creation, and require the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to invest in a flagship experience.