The OnePlus 11R and Oppo Reno10 (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range and upper-mid-range smartphone market. The Reno10 focuses on a streamlined experience with a capable, efficient chipset, while the 11R aggressively targets performance with a flagship-level processor from the previous generation. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 11R is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly higher performance, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Reno10 offers respectable efficiency, the 11R’s 100W charging and overall power outweigh its slightly larger manufacturing process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF
32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | PHW110 | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- 80W fast charging with PD and QC3 support
- Potentially more compact design (speculation)
- Significantly lower CPU and GPU performance
- Less capable image processing
- Slower charging compared to the 11R
OnePlus 11R
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- 100W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Superior thermal management due to 4nm process
- Potentially lower battery life due to higher power draw
- May run warmer under sustained load (though mitigated by 4nm)
- Likely larger and heavier than the Reno10
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno10's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel focused on color accuracy and viewing angles. The 11R, aiming for a more enthusiast audience, may prioritize a higher refresh rate. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone dynamically adjusts refresh rates for optimal power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of devices in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the 11R’s flagship-level chipset likely enables more sophisticated image processing capabilities. The Reno10, while capable, will be constrained by the processing power of the 778G. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors not provided, but the 11R’s higher processing power suggests better low-light performance and dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 11R’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno10’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the Reno10’s single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 core, three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and four 1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process of the 8+ Gen 1 provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The 11R will demonstrably outperform the Reno10 in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 11R boasts 100W wired charging, significantly faster than the Reno10’s 80W. This translates to a quicker top-up time, with the 11R likely achieving a full charge in under 30 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the 11R’s more efficient chipset and faster charging mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Reno10’s 80W charging is still fast, reaching 50% in 11 minutes, but the 11R offers a more convenient charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 (China) if you prioritize a balance of efficiency and everyday usability, and are less concerned with pushing the phone to its absolute performance limits. It’s a solid option for users who primarily browse, use social media, and take casual photos. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you demand raw power for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. It’s the clear winner for performance-focused users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the OnePlus 11R overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm manufacturing process and OnePlus’s thermal management solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) are designed to mitigate overheating. It will run warmer than the Reno10, but should maintain stable performance for extended gaming periods without significant throttling.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the Oppo Reno10 fast enough for daily use?
Yes, 80W charging is still very fast and can replenish 50% of the battery in just 11 minutes. However, it doesn’t match the speed of the 11R’s 100W charging, which offers a more convenient and quicker top-up experience.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo Reno10 handle demanding apps and multitasking well?
The Snapdragon 778G is a capable mid-range chip that can handle most everyday tasks and moderate multitasking without issue. However, it will struggle with very demanding apps or heavy multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the OnePlus 11R.
