The Oppo Reno10 (China) and Honor 80 Pro Flat represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range to upper-mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for a premium feel, they diverge significantly in their core processing power, with the Reno10 utilizing the Snapdragon 778G 5G and the Honor 80 Pro Flat boasting the more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison will dissect these differences, focusing on real-world impact for the user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Honor 80 Pro Flat is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial leap in processing and graphics capabilities over the Reno10’s 778G. However, the Reno10 remains a viable option for those seeking a balanced experience with efficient power consumption and potentially a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 24 | 2023, January 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 186 g or 193 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF
32 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 160 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 0.75µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 50% in 11 min
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 3-50% in 15 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Green, Pink |
| Models | PHW110 | - |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 450 EUR |
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G for all-day battery life
- Significantly less powerful processor than the Honor 80 Pro Flat
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Superior gaming and multitasking capabilities
- More efficient processor for sustained performance
- Slower 66W wired charging compared to the Reno10
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature OLED panels common in this price bracket. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Honor 80 Pro Flat, being positioned as a more premium device, likely benefits from a higher peak brightness and potentially a more sophisticated color calibration. The Reno10, while still offering a good visual experience, will likely prioritize power efficiency in its display settings. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Honor 80 Pro Flat, as the higher-tier device, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This translates to better low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality. Both phones will likely offer a suite of camera modes, but the 8+ Gen 1’s processing power will enable faster image processing and potentially more sophisticated computational photography features. We can assume both will have capable main sensors, but the Honor 80 Pro Flat likely has an edge in overall camera performance.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Honor 80 Pro Flat’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Oppo Reno10’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 778G, with its Cortex-A78 cores, is a capable mid-range chip, but it simply cannot match the 8+ Gen 1’s sustained performance. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Reno10 will be perfectly adequate for most daily tasks, but the Honor 80 Pro Flat will handle demanding applications and games with ease.
Battery Life
The Honor 80 Pro Flat features 66W wired charging, claiming a 3-50% charge in 15 minutes, while the Oppo Reno10 boasts 80W charging, achieving 50% in 11 minutes. While the Reno10 charges slightly faster, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 80 Pro Flat is more power-efficient. This means the Honor 80 Pro Flat, despite potentially having a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity, could offer comparable or even better real-world battery life. The Reno10’s faster charging is a benefit, but the 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency mitigates the difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno10 (China) if you need a phone with excellent power efficiency for all-day use and prioritize a potentially lower price. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Honor 80 Pro Flat if you prefer a significantly faster processor for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to accept slightly higher power consumption. This is the choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor 80 Pro Flat get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm process node is remarkably efficient. The Honor 80 Pro Flat is expected to manage heat effectively, but some warming is inevitable during extended gaming. However, it should throttle less frequently than older flagship chips.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo Reno10 sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 778G can handle PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It won't deliver the same smooth experience as the Honor 80 Pro Flat, especially at higher settings.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno10 support VOOC charging, or is the 80W charging standard different?
The Oppo Reno10 utilizes SuperVOOC charging, which is based on the proprietary VOOC standard. While it supports PD and QC3, using a compatible SuperVOOC charger will deliver the fastest charging speeds.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the two phones, and will I notice a significant difference in photo quality?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 has a more advanced ISP, enabling superior noise reduction, dynamic range, and detail preservation, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. You'll likely notice a significant improvement in photo quality, especially in low-light scenarios.
