Oppo's Reno series is known for its stylish designs and capable cameras. The Reno Z and Reno2 F are both mid-range contenders, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno Z generally edges out the Reno2 F thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better overall performance. However, the Reno2 F might offer a more refined software experience and potentially better camera optimization depending on software updates. It's a close call, but the Reno Z offers a bit more raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, June | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.3 x 74.9 x 9.1 mm (6.19 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.3", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 360 h (2G) / Up to 435 h (3G) | Up to 350 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4035 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jet Black, Aurora Purple - EuropeStar Purple, Extreme Night Black, Coral Orange, Bead White - China | Sky White, Lake Green |
| Models | PCDM10, CPH1979 | CPH1989 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -86.6dB / Crosstalk -86.8dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 67dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 74dB | - |
Oppo Reno Z
- More powerful chipset (Helio P90)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Slightly more modern design (likely)
- Good value for performance
- Camera software optimization might be less refined
- May lack some of the Reno2 F's software features
Oppo Reno2 F
- Potentially better camera software optimization
- Polished software experience
- Good design
- Often available at competitive prices
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P70)
- Slightly older hardware
- May not handle demanding games as well
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, likely with similar resolutions (likely FHD+). The Reno Z might have a slightly more modern panel with better color accuracy, but this is difficult to confirm without specific display testing data. Expect vibrant colors and deep blacks on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones boast multiple rear cameras, likely including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, and depth sensor. The Reno2 F might have slightly better camera software optimization, leading to more consistent results in various lighting conditions. The Reno Z's hardware is capable, but software plays a crucial role in image quality.
Performance
The Reno Z's Helio P90 chipset is generally considered more powerful than the Reno2 F's Helio P70. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and potentially better gaming performance. The P90's Cortex-A75 cores offer a performance boost over the Reno2 F's Cortex-A73 cores.
Battery Life
Both phones have a similar battery capacity (likely around 4000mAh) and 20W charging. Expect all-day battery life with moderate usage on either device. Charging speeds are relatively standard for this price range.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno Z is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a slightly more modern chipset. The Oppo Reno2 F is a good choice for those who value a polished software experience and potentially a more consistent camera performance, especially if they find a good deal.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno Z is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful Helio P90 chipset.
❓ Does the Reno2 F have a better camera?
While the Reno Z has capable hardware, the Reno2 F might offer slightly better camera software optimization, leading to more consistent results.
❓ Are the batteries similar?
Yes, both phones have a similar battery capacity and charging speed.
❓ Which phone has the better design?
Design is subjective, but the Reno Z likely has a slightly more modern aesthetic.