Oppo Reno Ace vs Oppo Reno Z: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno Ace is the clear winner for performance and charging speed, thanks to its Snapdragon 855+ chipset and 65W SuperVOOC. However, the Reno Z offers a more budget-friendly option. If raw power and fast charging are priorities, the Ace is the choice; otherwise, the Z provides decent value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno Ace | Oppo Reno Z |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, May. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 157.3 x 74.9 x 9.1 mm (6.19 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 7.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; (gyro-EIS); video rec. only with main camera | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | - | HTML |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 360 h (2G) / Up to 435 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4035 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric purple, Interstellar blue, Gundam Edition | Jet Black, Aurora Purple - EuropeStar Purple, Extreme Night Black, Coral Orange, Bead White - China |
| Models | PCLM10 | PCDM10, CPH1979 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.0dB / Crosstalk -93.3dB | Noise -86.6dB / Crosstalk -86.8dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 79dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 87dB | Voice 67dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 74dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 354367 (v7), 434063 (v8) GeekBench: 11008 (v4.4), 2627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno Ace
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 855+ performance
- Incredible 65W SuperVOOC charging
- High brightness display (717 nits)
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance rating)
- Premium build quality (likely)
- Likely more expensive
- Older model (may lack latest software features)
- Potentially larger and heavier
Oppo Reno Z
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Decent camera for casual use
- Compact size (likely)
- Significantly slower performance (Helio P90)
- Slow 20W charging
- Lower display brightness
- Less impressive camera quality
Display Comparison
The Reno Ace boasts a significantly brighter display at 717 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno Z's display has an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely marketing), it likely lacks the Ace's vibrancy and outdoor usability. Both likely feature AMOLED panels, but the Ace's brightness advantage is key.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities, but the Reno Ace likely has a more advanced camera system. While specific specs are missing, the 855+ chipset often paired with better camera sensors and image processing. The Reno Z's camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but won't match the Ace's potential.
Performance
The Reno Ace's Snapdragon 855+ is a substantial upgrade over the Reno Z's Helio P90. Expect significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Ace. The Ace's CPU and GPU are in a different league.
Battery Life
The Reno Ace's endurance rating of 99 hours is exceptional, suggesting a large battery and efficient power management. The Reno Z, with its 20W charging, will take considerably longer to charge. The Ace's 65W charging is a game-changer, offering a full charge in just 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno Ace is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and incredibly fast charging. The Oppo Reno Z is a good fit for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and a decent camera experience without breaking the bank.