The smartphone landscape is crowded with compelling mid-range options. We pit the Oppo Reno A, powered by the Snapdragon 710, against the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro, boasting the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, to determine which device delivers the best balance of performance, features, and value. This isn't just a spec sheet comparison; it's a deep dive into how these chips translate to real-world user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities compared to the Oppo Reno A's Snapdragon 710. While the Reno A may offer a slightly more refined software experience, the F5 Pro's raw power and fast charging capabilities justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.4 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.4, 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Black, White |
| Models | CPH1983 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno A
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- May be more affordable
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco F5 Pro
- Less future-proof
- Likely slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- 67W fast wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- May be slightly more expensive
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be resource intensive
- Larger size and weight compared to some competitors
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro immediately pulls ahead with its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo Reno A (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower given the chipset and target price point). While both devices feature a 'Photo/Video' capable display, the F5 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The Reno A’s display specifications are less defined, suggesting a more standard LCD or lower-tier AMOLED panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo/Video' capabilities, but the lack of specific sensor details makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given the Poco F5 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it’s reasonable to assume it features a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Reno A likely relies on a more basic camera setup, adequate for casual photography but lacking the dynamic range and low-light performance of a flagship-tier sensor. The absence of detail on either phone suggests neither prioritizes camera innovation as a key selling point.
Performance
This is where the gap widens dramatically. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-performance Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo Reno A’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm), which utilizes a more modest octa-core setup with Kryo cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 delivers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The F5 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the Reno A will likely struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices share an endurance rating of 99 hours. However, this doesn't tell the whole story. The Poco F5 Pro compensates for any potential battery capacity differences with its significantly faster charging capabilities: 67W wired (50% in 15 minutes) and 30W wireless (50% in 32 minutes). The Reno A’s charging specifications are not provided, suggesting a slower charging rate. The F5 Pro’s fast charging is a major convenience factor, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed, mitigating any potential battery life concerns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno A if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, and prioritize a potentially smoother, more streamlined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you're a gamer, a power user who frequently multitasks, or simply want a phone that will remain responsive and capable for years to come. The F5 Pro’s superior chipset and charging speed make it the better long-term investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its improved thermal efficiency compared to its predecessor. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the Poco F5 Pro likely incorporates effective cooling solutions to mitigate throttling and maintain stable performance. The 4nm process node also contributes to lower heat output.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 710 and 8+ Gen 1 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is substantial. While the Snapdragon 710 is adequate for basic tasks, the 8+ Gen 1 provides a much smoother and more responsive experience, especially when multitasking, opening apps, and scrolling through demanding websites. The F5 Pro will feel significantly faster and more fluid in daily use.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, phones with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 typically support high refresh rate gaming (90Hz, 120Hz, or higher) depending on the game and display capabilities. This results in smoother animations and a more immersive gaming experience.
