The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno A and Realme 11 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Reno A, powered by the older Snapdragon 710, aims for value, while the 11 Pro+ leverages the newer Dimensity 7050 and boasts impressive charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 11 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo Reno A, coupled with significantly faster 100W charging and a brighter display. While the Reno A offers a potentially lower price point, the 11 Pro+'s advantages justify the cost for all but the most frugal buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.4 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.4, 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | CPH1983 | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
Oppo Reno A
- Potentially lower price point
- Familiar Oppo UI
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Older Snapdragon 710 chipset
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Less vibrant display
Realme 11 Pro+
- Faster Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset
- 100W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display (793 nits)
- Potentially better camera system
- May be slightly more expensive
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ features a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Reno A, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Reno A's panel specifics are unknown, it likely falls short of this peak brightness. The 11 Pro+'s brightness isn't just about visibility; it contributes to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate adjustments won't be as power-efficient as on flagship models, but the brighter panel on the 11 Pro+ is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+’s camera system is likely to be more capable, though detailed sensor information is missing for both devices. However, the 11 Pro+’s focus on photography, often a Realme strength, suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The Reno A, while capable, is likely to offer a more basic camera experience. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the 11 Pro+ (a common feature in this price range) would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can safely assume the 11 Pro+ will offer more versatile shooting modes and potentially better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference here lies in the chipsets. The Realme 11 Pro+'s Mediatek Dimensity 7050, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno A’s 10nm Snapdragon 710. The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.6 GHz) are considerably more powerful than the Kryo 360 Gold cores (2x2.2 GHz) in the Snapdragon 710. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both utilize octa-core configurations, the Dimensity 7050’s architecture provides a clear performance edge.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer. While the Reno A’s charging speed is unspecified, it’s unlikely to compete. The 11 Pro+ can likely charge from 0-100% in under 30 minutes, a massive convenience factor. The 11 Pro+’s endurance rating of 112 hours suggests a respectable battery life, but the faster charging mitigates concerns about capacity. The Snapdragon 710 in the Reno A, being less power-efficient, may require more frequent charging, even with a comparable battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno A if you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost and are comfortable with a less powerful processor for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter and more vibrant display, and the convenience of incredibly rapid 100W charging – making it ideal for power users and those constantly on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7050's 6nm process is more efficient than the Snapdragon 710's 10nm process, meaning it generates less heat. While some heat is inevitable during demanding games, the 11 Pro+ is likely to manage thermals better than the Reno A, resulting in less performance throttling over extended periods.
❓ Is the 100W charging on the Realme 11 Pro+ safe for the battery's long-term health?
Realme employs various safety mechanisms within its 100W SuperVOOC charging system to protect the battery. These include optimized charging algorithms and temperature control. While fast charging *can* theoretically contribute to faster battery degradation over years of use, the benefits of convenience generally outweigh the risks for most users.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo Reno A handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 7050?
The Dimensity 7050's more modern CPU architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable advantage in multitasking. The Reno A's Snapdragon 710 may struggle with numerous apps open simultaneously, leading to slowdowns and app reloads, whereas the 11 Pro+ should handle heavier multitasking loads more smoothly.
