Oppo Reno A vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Oppo Reno A’s Snapdragon 710. The brighter display and faster charging further solidify its position, justifying the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno A | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.4 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.4, 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Black, Grey |
| Models | CPH1983 | A142P |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
Oppo Reno A
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Potentially more compact design (based on Reno series history).
- Reliable Snapdragon 710 for basic tasks.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus.
- Likely inferior display brightness and color accuracy.
- Slower charging speeds.
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 7350 Pro.
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- Faster 50W charging.
- Longer battery life (16:34h active use).
- Higher price tag.
- May be larger and heavier than the Reno A.
- Software experience may not appeal to all users.
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1097 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Reno A, making it far more usable outdoors. While the Reno A’s panel specifics are unknown, it likely falls short in peak brightness. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight and a more immersive viewing experience. We can assume the Reno A uses an AMOLED panel, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Reno A, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus likely benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 7350 Pro, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Reno A’s camera system is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus offers a more modern and capable imaging experience. We can assume the Reno A has a standard camera setup, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus benefits from a more advanced ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the Oppo Reno A’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The Dimensity 7350 Pro features newer Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 3.0 GHz, compared to the Reno A’s Kryo 360 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity chip also provides superior power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and maintain performance for longer periods. The Reno A will struggle with graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 16 hours and 34 minutes of active use. While the Reno A’s battery capacity is unknown, the Dimensity 7350 Pro’s 4nm efficiency gives the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus supports 50W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 21 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes. This is considerably faster than what we’d expect from the Reno A, offering a more convenient charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno A if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are comfortable with a less powerful processor for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you demand smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging speeds – even if it means spending a bit more.