Oppo Reno A vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 710 in the Reno A, coupled with significantly better battery life – boasting over 10 hours of active use and 68W fast charging. While the Reno A may appeal to those seeking a potentially lower price point, the Edge 40 Neo provides a more future-proof and enjoyable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno A | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.4 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.4, 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CPH1983 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Oppo Reno A
- Potentially lower price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 is a proven performer for basic tasks
- Familiar Android experience (likely)
- Older chipset architecture
- Likely inferior battery life
- Missing display specifications raise concerns
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Superior performance with MediaTek Dimensity 7030
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Fast 68W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- MediaTek chipset may not have the same brand recognition as Qualcomm
- Software update support may vary
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, something the Reno A’s display specifications lack. While the Reno A’s panel details are unavailable, the Edge 40 Neo’s high brightness, combined with its likely OLED technology (common in this price range), suggests superior contrast and color vibrancy. The absence of refresh rate information for the Reno A further highlights the Edge 40 Neo’s potential advantage, as higher refresh rates contribute to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the Oppo Reno A are missing, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to offer a more modern experience. While the specifics of its sensors are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s focus on both photo and video capabilities suggests a well-rounded imaging experience. The Reno A’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual use, but the Edge 40 Neo is expected to deliver superior image quality and more versatile shooting options, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo Reno A’s 10nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 710. The Dimensity 7030 utilizes more efficient Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.5 GHz) compared to the Kryo 360 Gold cores (2x2.2 GHz) in the Snapdragon 710. This translates to better single-core performance and improved power efficiency. The 6nm node also contributes to reduced heat generation, potentially leading to sustained performance during demanding tasks. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 7030’s architecture provides a tangible performance edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate exceptional battery life. The 68W wired charging capability is another significant advantage, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Oppo Reno A’s battery capacity is unknown, but without comparable fast charging technology, it’s unlikely to match the Edge 40 Neo’s convenience and longevity. The Dimensity 7030’s power efficiency further contributes to the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno A if you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost and are comfortable with a chipset that, while capable, is showing its age. It's suitable for basic smartphone tasks and light multitasking. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value performance, battery endurance, and faster charging. This phone is ideal for users who stream videos, play mobile games, and demand a more responsive overall experience.