Google Pixel 7a vs Oppo Reno A: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly better performance and future-proofing, coupled with a class-leading camera experience. While the Oppo Reno A offers respectable efficiency, it falls behind in processing power and overall feature set.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno A | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.4 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.4, 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | CPH1983 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Oppo Reno A
- Efficient Snapdragon 710 processor for everyday tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Likely more affordable price point
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Pixel 7a
- Inferior camera capabilities
- Older chipset with limited future software support
Google Pixel 7a
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 chipset for smooth performance
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s computational photography
- Faster charging speeds and wireless charging support
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Reno A
- Higher price point
- Tensor G2 can run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the Reno A’s unspecified brightness. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno A’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel offers richer colors and deeper blacks. The absence of high refresh rate information for the Reno A suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Pixel 7a is expected to have a 90Hz panel, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP), delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno A’s camera is likely competent, but lacks the advanced algorithms and features of the Pixel 7a. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s enhanced video processing capabilities. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lens on the Reno A, the Pixel 7a’s focus on core camera performance provides a more consistent and reliable experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno A’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The Tensor G2’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, provides a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and AI processing. The Snapdragon 710’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold cores are adequate for everyday use, but will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load. The Pixel 7a is expected to have faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating good battery life despite its performance-focused chipset. The Reno A’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less powerful Snapdragon 710 should contribute to longer battery life under light usage. The Pixel 7a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, offering convenient charging options. The Reno A’s charging capabilities are unspecified, but likely slower than the Pixel 7a’s wired charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno A if you prioritize long-term battery life and a more conservative, efficient processor for basic tasks. It’s a solid option for users who primarily browse, text, and make calls. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value camera quality, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google’s latest AI features, even if it means slightly shorter battery endurance.