Oppo Reno 10x Zoom vs Xiaomi Poco F5: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 takes the crown thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and more modern chipset. While the Reno 10x Zoom boasts a longer endurance rating, the Poco F5's overall package delivers a more compelling experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno 10x zoom | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, June | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | CPH1919, PCCM00 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 1020 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 107h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8) GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Impressive 10x optical zoom
- Longer endurance rating (potentially)
- Premium design
- Outdated Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slow 20W charging
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Excellent value for money
- May lack the same premium feel as the Reno 10x Zoom
- No 10x optical zoom
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 absolutely dominates in the display department. Its 963 nits peak brightness is a massive leap over the Reno 10x Zoom's 440 nits, making it far more usable outdoors and in bright environments. Both offer infinite contrast ratios (nominal), but the Poco F5's superior brightness provides a much more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Poco F5 likely uses AMOLED technology, while the Reno 10x Zoom likely uses OLED, but the brightness difference is the key factor here.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, but specifics are missing. The Reno 10x Zoom's primary selling point was its 10x optical zoom, which the Poco F5 lacks. However, the Poco F5 likely has a more modern image processing pipeline and potentially better low-light performance due to its newer chipset. Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Poco F5 likely holds an edge.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a significant upgrade over the Reno 10x Zoom's Snapdragon 855. The 7+ Gen 2 is built on a more efficient 4nm process, offering better performance and power efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Poco F5. The Reno 10x Zoom's 855 is still capable, but it shows its age compared to the newer chipset.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom boasts a slightly higher endurance rating (107h vs 118h), suggesting it might last a bit longer on a single charge under similar usage. However, the Poco F5's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 46 minutes – a stark contrast to the Reno 10x Zoom's 20W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom is ideal for photography enthusiasts who prioritize zoom capabilities and a slightly longer battery life. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone seeking exceptional performance and fast charging without breaking the bank.