The Oppo R7 Plus, a phone from a bygone era, boasted impressive battery life. Now, it faces off against the modern Samsung Galaxy A34, a mid-range powerhouse. Can the older phone still compete, or does Samsung's latest offering take the crown? Let's dive in!
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner. While the Oppo R7 Plus had exceptional battery endurance for its time, the A34’s superior performance, brighter display, and modern features make it a more compelling choice for today's users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Global, Taiwan | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 2, 4, 7, 17 - USA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, May. Released 2015, May | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158 x 82 x 7.8 mm (6.22 x 3.23 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 2.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 4.5 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Schneider-Kreuznach optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@60fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4 | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Golden, Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | R7plusf | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -94.3dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 94h
|
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.499 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 73dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 79dB
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 968Basemark X: 5349 |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo R7 Plus
- Exceptional battery life (for its time)
- Fast charging (75% in 30 mins)
- Compact design (likely)
- Outdated chipset
- Lower screen brightness
- Older camera technology
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Bright and vibrant display
- Modern and powerful chipset
- Improved camera system
- Long battery life
- Modern software and updates
- Charging speed could be faster (25W)
- Plastic build (likely)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34’s display is significantly better. Its 1009 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a feature the Oppo R7 Plus lacks. While both claim 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the A34’s Super AMOLED panel offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities listed, the Galaxy A34’s camera system is considerably more advanced. It likely features a higher resolution main sensor, improved image processing, and potentially additional lenses (ultrawide, macro). The R7 Plus camera is likely dated by today's standards.
Performance
The Galaxy A34’s Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo R7 Plus’s Snapdragon 615. The A34’s newer CPU architecture and 6nm manufacturing process result in faster performance and improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming on the A34.
Battery Life
The Oppo R7 Plus initially had a remarkable endurance rating of 94 hours. However, the Samsung Galaxy A34 matches this with 133 hours, and benefits from faster 25W charging compared to the R7 Plus's 20W. Modern software optimization also contributes to the A34's efficient power usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo R7 Plus is best for those seeking a very long-lasting battery and are comfortable with an older device and potentially limited software support. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for users wanting a balance of performance, a vibrant display, a capable camera, and modern features at a reasonable price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo R7 Plus still worth buying?
Unless you specifically need an extremely long-lasting battery and are comfortable with an older device, the Oppo R7 Plus is not recommended. Modern phones offer significantly better performance and features.
❓ What is the biggest difference between these two phones?
The biggest difference is the age and technology. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a modern mid-range phone with a powerful processor, vibrant display, and improved camera, while the Oppo R7 Plus is an older device with a focus on battery life.
