The Oppo R7 series was a popular choice for budget-conscious smartphone users. But with two models – the R7 Lite and the R7s – choosing between them can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo R7s emerges as the clear winner, primarily due to its significantly superior battery life. While both share the same chipset, the R7s' endurance rating and display enhancements provide a better overall user experience, justifying its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Global, Philippines | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Global, Taiwan, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 40 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40 - Philippines | 1, 2, 4, 7, 17 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, September. Released 2015, October | 2015, October. Released 2015, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 143 x 71 x 6.3 mm (5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 in) | 151.8 x 75.4 x 7 mm (5.98 x 2.97 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 147 g (5.19 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Adreno 405 |
| OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 2.1 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 4.5 | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Schneider-Kreuznach optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
QVGA | - |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 2320 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3070 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Golden, Silver | Golden |
| Models | R7kf | R7sf |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -94.5dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 73h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.964 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 73dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 71dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 930Basemark X: 5302 |
Oppo R7 lite
- Faster Charging (20W)
- Slightly more compact design
- Generally more affordable
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially less RAM
- Slightly inferior display
Oppo R7s
- Exceptional battery life (73h endurance)
- Superior display contrast
- Likely better camera performance
- Potentially more RAM (3GB)
- Slightly larger size
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 5.5-inch AMOLED display, but the R7s boasts a notably higher contrast ratio (Infinite nominal, 3.964 in sunlight) suggesting better visibility and color accuracy, especially outdoors. The R7 Lite's display is still good, but lacks the R7s' punch.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the R7s generally received slightly better reviews for its camera performance, particularly in low-light conditions. The R7s likely has a slightly improved sensor or image processing algorithms. Expect decent image quality from both, but the R7s is the preferred choice for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset and octa-core CPU, performance is largely comparable. Expect smooth everyday usage, but demanding games might show some limitations. RAM configurations (likely 2GB for R7 Lite, 3GB for R7s) could give the R7s a slight edge in multitasking.
Battery Life
This is where the R7s truly shines. Its endurance rating of 73 hours significantly surpasses the R7 Lite's (estimated around 30-35 hours based on similar specs). This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, a major advantage for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The Oppo R7 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more compact design. The Oppo R7s is best suited for those who value long battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means a slightly larger device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo R7 Lite still worth buying?
If you're on a very tight budget and prioritize fast charging, the R7 Lite can still be a decent option. However, the R7s offers significantly better value overall.
❓ What is the difference in RAM between the R7 Lite and R7s?
The Oppo R7 Lite typically came with 2GB of RAM, while the R7s usually featured 3GB, providing a slight advantage in multitasking.
