The Oppo Pad SE and OnePlus Pad Lite represent a fascinating trend in the Android tablet space: affordable, capable devices aimed at media consumption and light productivity. Both tablets are built around the same Mediatek Helio G100 chipset, making a direct hardware comparison less about raw power and more about software optimization, ecosystem integration, and subtle feature differences. This comparison will dissect those nuances to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Pad Lite offers a slightly better value proposition. While both tablets deliver identical performance thanks to the Helio G100, the OnePlus Pad Lite’s wider availability and potentially more streamlined software experience give it a slight edge. However, Oppo’s UFCS charging is a compelling feature for those invested in the Oppo ecosystem.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 - cellular model only | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - cellular model only |
| 4G bands | LTE - cellular model only | LTE - cellular model only |
| Speed | LTE - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2025, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | - |
| Dimensions | 254.9 x 166.5 x 7.4 mm (10.04 x 6.56 x 0.29 in) | 254.9 x 166.5 x 7.4 mm (10.04 x 6.56 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM - cellular model only | Yes - cellular model only |
| Weight | 527 g or 530 g (1.16 lb) | 530 g (1.17 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~207 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 347.5 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers, Hi-Res audio) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (cellular model only) | GPS, (cellular model only) - unconfirmed |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass (LTE model only) | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 33W UFCS, PD | 33W wired |
| Type | 9340 mAh | Li-Po 9340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Blue, Starlight Silver | Aero Blue |
| Models | OPD2417 | OPD2480 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo Pad SE
- UFCS charging compatibility for faster charging with Oppo accessories.
- Potential for deeper integration with the Oppo ecosystem.
- Identical performance to the OnePlus Pad Lite.
- Potentially less frequent software updates compared to OnePlus.
- Availability may be limited to certain regions.
OnePlus Pad Lite
- Wider availability and potentially easier to purchase.
- OxygenOS typically offers a cleaner software experience.
- Identical performance to the Oppo Pad SE.
- Lacks UFCS charging support.
- May receive fewer exclusive features compared to Oppo devices.
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Pad SE and OnePlus Pad Lite are expected to feature 10.36-inch LCD panels, though detailed specifications like resolution and peak brightness are not provided. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither tablet will offer adaptive refresh rates, meaning a fixed 60Hz experience is likely. The real-world impact will be similar viewing experiences, with color accuracy and brightness being key differentiators that require hands-on testing. Bezels are expected to be relatively uniform on both devices, typical for this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Details on camera sensors are missing, but given the price point, expect modest image quality suitable for video calls and casual snapshots. The focus should be on the front-facing camera for video conferencing, as tablet cameras are rarely a priority for most users. Any differences in image processing algorithms between Oppo’s ColorOS and OnePlus’ OxygenOS will likely be subtle.
Performance
The core of both tablets is the Mediatek Helio G100 (6nm), paired with an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means identical CPU and GPU performance. The lack of information regarding RAM type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) and speed is a critical omission; faster RAM would translate to snappier multitasking. Thermal management will likely be similar, relying on passive cooling given the tablet's form factor and chipset's efficiency. Expect smooth performance for everyday tasks, streaming, and light gaming, but don't anticipate flagship-level responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both tablets support 33W wired charging, but the Oppo Pad SE adds the benefit of 33W UFCS (Universal Fast Charging Support) and PD. UFCS compatibility allows for potentially faster charging speeds when paired with compatible Oppo chargers, while PD ensures broader compatibility with standard USB-PD power adapters. While the battery capacity remains undisclosed, 33W charging should provide reasonable charge times, likely around 90-120 minutes for a full 0-100% charge. The UFCS feature gives Oppo a slight advantage for existing Oppo users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Pad SE if you are already heavily invested in the Oppo ecosystem and can benefit from the Universal Fast Charging Support (UFCS) compatibility with your other devices. This allows for potentially faster charging with compatible Oppo chargers. Buy the OnePlus Pad Lite if you prioritize a clean, potentially more frequently updated software experience and broader availability, without being locked into a specific charging standard.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the OnePlus Pad Lite work with Oppo chargers, and vice versa?
The OnePlus Pad Lite supports standard USB-PD charging, which is widely compatible. The Oppo Pad SE supports both USB-PD and UFCS. While a OnePlus charger will work with the Oppo Pad SE, you won't benefit from UFCS fast charging unless you use a compatible Oppo charger. Conversely, the Oppo Pad SE's charger will work with the OnePlus Pad Lite, but at standard USB-PD speeds.
❓ Can either of these tablets be used for gaming, and if so, what kind of performance can I expect?
Both tablets utilize the Mediatek Helio G100, which is capable of handling casual gaming. Expect playable frame rates in titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings. However, demanding games at high settings may experience frame drops. The lack of active cooling means sustained performance may be limited during extended gaming sessions.
❓ What software experience can I expect on each tablet?
The Oppo Pad SE will run on Oppo’s ColorOS for Pad, while the OnePlus Pad Lite runs on OxygenOS. OxygenOS is generally known for its cleaner, more stock-Android-like interface, while ColorOS offers more customization options and features. Both are based on Android, but the user experience will differ in terms of aesthetics and pre-installed apps.
