The Android tablet market is heating up, with both Oppo and Honor offering compelling options in the mid-range. The Oppo Pad SE focuses on affordability and efficient performance, while the Honor Pad 9 Pro aims for a more premium experience with a significantly more powerful chipset. This comparison dives deep into the key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Pad 9 Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo Pad SE’s Helio G100, making it better suited for demanding tasks and future-proofing. However, the Oppo Pad SE remains a viable option for casual users prioritizing value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 - cellular model only | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE - cellular model only | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | LTE - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2024, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 23 | Available. Released 2024, July 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 254.9 x 166.5 x 7.4 mm (10.04 x 6.56 x 0.29 in) | 277 x 179.9 x 6.6 mm (10.91 x 7.08 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM - cellular model only | No |
| Weight | 527 g or 530 g (1.16 lb) | 589 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Magic OS 8.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (cellular model only) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass (LTE model only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 33W UFCS, PD | 35W wired |
| Type | 9340 mAh | Li-Po 10050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Blue, Starlight Silver | Sky Blue, Star Gray |
| Models | OPD2417 | - |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Oppo Pad SE
- More affordable price point
- UFCS charging offers wider charger compatibility
- Sufficient for basic tasks and media consumption
- Significantly less powerful chipset
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
- Potential for performance throttling under heavy load
Honor Pad 9 Pro
- Much faster and more efficient Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Better suited for gaming, multitasking, and creative work
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- May offer limited advantages for very basic users
- Battery life could be impacted by the more powerful processor
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality details like resolution and refresh rate are missing, but the chipset's ability to smoothly render content is paramount. The Honor Pad 9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 will handle graphically intensive games and video playback with greater ease, potentially offering a more fluid visual experience even on a similar panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided for either device. Given the market segment, it’s reasonable to expect basic camera setups focused on video calls and casual snapshots. Image processing capabilities will largely depend on software optimization, but the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s more powerful chipset could potentially enable more advanced features like better noise reduction or HDR processing. Without specific sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) in the Honor Pad 9 Pro represents a significant leap over the Helio G100 (6nm) found in the Oppo Pad SE. The Dimensity 8100’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.85 GHz, offer substantially higher single-core performance compared to the G100’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The G100 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s 35W wired charging offers a slight advantage over the Oppo Pad SE’s 33W wired, 33W UFCS, and PD support. UFCS (Universal Fast Charging) on the Oppo Pad SE offers broader compatibility with different chargers, but the raw wattage of the Honor Pad 9 Pro suggests potentially faster charging times from 0-100%. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns and battery capacity, but the Dimensity 8100’s improved efficiency could partially offset any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Pad SE if you need a tablet primarily for media consumption, light web browsing, and basic productivity tasks, and are on a tight budget. Its Helio G100 chipset is sufficient for these workloads. Buy the Honor Pad 9 Pro if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, or creative applications, and are willing to spend a bit more. The Dimensity 8100 offers a significantly smoother and more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor Pad 9 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8100’s 5nm fabrication process is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Oppo Pad SE’s Helio G100. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the 8100 is less prone to significant throttling, allowing for more sustained performance. However, sustained peak performance will still generate heat, and the tablet's cooling solution will play a role.
❓ Is the Oppo Pad SE sufficient for streaming video and browsing the web?
Yes, the Oppo Pad SE’s Helio G100 chipset is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks like streaming video (Netflix, YouTube) and web browsing. It won’t offer the same level of responsiveness as the Honor Pad 9 Pro, but it will provide a functional and enjoyable experience for casual users.
❓ Does the Honor Pad 9 Pro support high refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specifications, many tablets with the Dimensity 8100 chipset support high refresh rate displays (90Hz or 120Hz). However, this is dependent on the specific display panel used by Honor, and is not guaranteed.
