The tablet market offers a wide range of options, but finding the right balance between performance, features, and price can be challenging. We pit the recently released Oppo Pad Neo, powered by the Mediatek Helio G99, against the established Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) with its Helio P60T chipset to determine which tablet offers the best value for different user needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Pad Neo emerges as the superior choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Fire HD 10 Plus’s older 12nm Helio P60T. While the Fire HD 10 Plus offers the convenience of wireless charging, the Pad Neo’s faster 33W wired charging and overall processing power make it the better all-around tablet.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | - |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 16 | 2021, April 27. Released 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 16 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 255.1 x 188 x 6.9 mm (10.04 x 7.40 x 0.27 in) | 247 x 166 x 9.2 mm (9.72 x 6.54 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 538 g (1.19 lb) | 468 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1720 x 2408 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1920 x 1200 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.4 inches, 396.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Fire OS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 2 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass | Accelerometer |
| | - | Text-to-Speech English-language content reader |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD | Wireless |
| Type | 8000 mAh | Li-Ion |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Slate |
| Models | OPD2302, OPD2303 | T76N2P |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oppo Pad Neo
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- More efficient 6nm manufacturing process
- Faster 33W PD charging
- Likely better multitasking performance
- No wireless charging
- Display specs are unknown
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021)
- Wireless charging convenience
- Lower price point (typically)
- Integration with Amazon ecosystem
- Familiar Fire OS interface
- Older, less powerful processor (Helio P60T)
- Less efficient 12nm manufacturing process
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially limited app compatibility outside Amazon Appstore
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly high-end display. Both are likely to be 10.1-inch IPS LCD panels, a commonality in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs necessitates focusing on the chipset’s ability to drive the display smoothly. The Helio G99 in the Oppo Pad Neo, with its more modern GPU, will likely handle graphically intensive tasks on the display with greater ease. The Fire HD 10 Plus’s older GPU may exhibit more noticeable frame drops in demanding applications.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are likely equipped with basic camera sensors suitable for video calls and occasional snapshots. Given the context, detailed camera analysis is limited. The Oppo Pad Neo, benefiting from the more powerful ISP within the Helio G99, *may* offer slightly better image processing, but expectations should remain low. We can assume both tablets prioritize functionality over photographic quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Pad Neo’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores versus the Fire HD 10 Plus’s Cortex-A73 cores. This translates to a significant performance advantage for the Pad Neo, particularly in single-core tasks. The 6nm manufacturing process also provides better power efficiency, meaning longer battery life under load and less thermal throttling. The Helio P60T (12nm) in the Fire HD 10 Plus, while capable for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and multitasking. The Pad Neo’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is demonstrably more powerful than the Fire HD 10 Plus’s (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53).
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Helio G99’s 6nm process in the Oppo Pad Neo offers a significant advantage in power efficiency. This means the Pad Neo can potentially deliver comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity than the Fire HD 10 Plus. Furthermore, the Pad Neo supports 33W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Fire HD 10 Plus’s wireless charging, which is typically slower and less efficient. The convenience of wireless charging on the Fire HD 10 Plus is offset by the Pad Neo’s superior charging speed and efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Pad Neo if you prioritize performance for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, and value faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for students, professionals needing a portable productivity tool, or anyone who wants a responsive tablet experience. Buy the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) if you are deeply embedded in the Amazon ecosystem, prioritize wireless charging convenience, and primarily use your tablet for media consumption and basic tasks. Its lower price point makes it attractive for casual users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo Pad Neo handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Helio G99 is a capable chipset, demanding games will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The G99’s GPU is a step up from the P60T, but it’s not a flagship-level gaming processor. Expect playable frame rates at medium settings.
❓ How much does the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus’s reliance on the Amazon Appstore limit app availability?
The Fire HD 10 Plus primarily uses the Amazon Appstore, which has a smaller selection of apps compared to the Google Play Store. While many popular apps are available, some may be missing or require sideloading, which can be complex for less tech-savvy users. The Oppo Pad Neo, running a standard Android build, has access to the full Google Play Store ecosystem.
❓ Is the wireless charging on the Fire HD 10 Plus truly convenient, or is it too slow to be practical?
Wireless charging on the Fire HD 10 Plus is convenient, but it's significantly slower than the Oppo Pad Neo’s 33W wired charging. Expect a full charge to take several hours via wireless charging, making it more suitable for overnight charging rather than quick top-ups.
