The Android tablet market is heating up, with the Oppo Pad 5 and Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 vying for attention. While both aim to deliver a premium tablet experience, they take drastically different approaches to processing power and charging technology. This comparison dissects these key areas to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Pad 5 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset offers a significant leap in CPU and GPU capabilities. However, the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 remains a viable option for those seeking a more affordable tablet for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | LTE |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 16 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 22 | Available. Released 2022, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 266.9 x 193.4 x 6 mm (10.51 x 7.61 x 0.24 in) | 263.7 x 166.7 x 6.8 mm (10.38 x 6.56 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 577 g or 579 g (1.27 lb) | 480 g (1.06 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2120 x 3000 pixels (~304 ppi density) | 1536 x 2560 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 445.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 357.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, 600 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 120Hz, 420 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Mediatek MT8797 Kompanio 1300T (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, magnetic connector, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 67W UFCS, 55W PPS, 18W PD | 20W wired, QC3 |
| Type | 10420 mAh | Li-Po 8200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Purple | Storm Grey, Oat |
| Models | OPD2506 | ZAB50194GB, ZAB50043SE |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 616573 (v9)
GeekBench: 2827 (v5.1) |
Oppo Pad 5
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- Ultra-fast 67W charging for minimal downtime
- More future-proof chipset architecture
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for higher heat output under extreme load (though mitigated by 3nm process)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to less power-hungry chipset
- Slower processor struggles with demanding applications
- Significantly slower 20W charging
- Less future-proof chipset
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for both devices, the market positioning suggests the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 likely features an 11.2-inch OLED panel, common for its price range. The Oppo Pad 5, targeting a more premium segment, likely employs an LCD panel with a high refresh rate. The key difference will be color accuracy and contrast; OLED generally excels in these areas. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Oppo Pad 5’s potential for a higher refresh rate could provide a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a primary differentiator in this category. Both tablets likely feature similar camera setups focused on video conferencing and casual photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Oppo Pad 5, positioned as a more premium device, may incorporate slightly better image processing algorithms.
Performance
The performance gap between these tablets is substantial. The Oppo Pad 5’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) boasts a cutting-edge Cortex-X925 core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. This configuration, built on a 3nm process, delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2’s Mediatek MT8797 Kompanio 1300T (6nm) with its four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400+ also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Oppo Pad 5 will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 may struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the charging capabilities highlight a significant difference. The Oppo Pad 5 supports a blazing-fast 67W wired charging, alongside 67W UFCS, 55W PPS, and 18W PD. This allows for incredibly quick top-ups. The Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2, limited to 20W wired charging with QC3, will take considerably longer to reach a full charge. While a larger battery capacity on the Lenovo tablet could offset this, the convenience of the Oppo Pad 5’s rapid charging is a major advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Pad 5 if you need a tablet capable of demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or running multiple applications simultaneously. Its superior chipset and faster charging will significantly enhance your productivity and entertainment. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 if you prioritize value and a smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, streaming, and light productivity. It’s a solid choice for casual users who don’t require the absolute highest performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Kompanio 1300T in the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Kompanio 1300T is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding games like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Oppo Pad 5’s Dimensity 9400+ is far better equipped to handle such titles at higher settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo Pad 5 with the 67W charger?
With the 67W charger, the Oppo Pad 5 can realistically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 45-50 minutes, depending on background processes and battery health. This is significantly faster than the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2, which will likely take over 2 hours with its 20W charger.
❓ Is the difference in chipset architecture (3nm vs 6nm) noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and video streaming?
For basic tasks like browsing and video streaming, the difference between the 3nm Dimensity 9400+ and the 6nm Kompanio 1300T will be minimal. However, the 3nm process provides greater efficiency, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life during these activities. The real benefit of the 3nm node becomes apparent during sustained, demanding workloads.
