The Android tablet market is heating up, and the Oppo Pad 2 and Xiaomi Pad 5 are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive features and performance, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you choose the perfect tablet for your lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Pad 2 takes the lead with its significantly faster Dimensity 9000 chipset and faster charging. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 boasts a slightly better display and a more established ecosystem. Ultimately, the Oppo Pad 2 offers superior performance for demanding users, while the Xiaomi Pad 5 provides a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 21 | 2021, August 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, August 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 258 x 189.4 x 6.5 mm (10.16 x 7.46 x 0.26 in) | 254.7 x 166.3 x 6.9 mm (10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 552 g (1.22 lb) | 511 g (1.13 lb) |
| | Stylus support, 2.0ms latency | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2000 x 2800 pixels (~296 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.61 inches, 411.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 144Hz, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | 13 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, 103˚ (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS (B1I+B1c) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, QC 2.0 | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 9510 mAh | Li-Po 8720 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Gold | Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green |
| Models | OPD2201, X22N2 | 21051182G, 21051182C |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1271:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 473819 (v8), 555079 (v9)
GeekBench: 2583 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Pad 2
- Significantly faster performance
- Faster 67W charging
- Sleek design
- Good audio quality
- Camera performance is average
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Pad 5
- Excellent display
- Good value for money
- Established Xiaomi ecosystem
- Decent camera
- Slower performance compared to Oppo Pad 2
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature excellent 11-inch LCD displays with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 1271:1 contrast ratio. The Xiaomi Pad 5 measures a slightly higher 478 nits of brightness, giving it a minor edge in outdoor visibility. Color accuracy is generally good on both, making them suitable for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Pad 2 typically features an 8MP front and rear camera, while the Xiaomi Pad 5 has a 13MP front and 13MP rear camera. Image quality is decent on both, but neither tablet excels in this area. They're suitable for video calls and casual snapshots, but not for serious photography.
Performance
This is where the Oppo Pad 2 truly shines. The Dimensity 9000 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 860. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and noticeably better gaming performance on the Oppo Pad 2. The Xiaomi Pad 5 is still capable, but it won't handle demanding tasks as effortlessly.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 5 has an 8720mAh battery, while the Oppo Pad 2 has an 8360mAh battery. While the Xiaomi Pad 5 has a slightly larger battery, the Oppo Pad 2's faster charging (67W vs 33W) allows it to charge much quicker. Real-world battery life is comparable, offering a full day of moderate use on both devices.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Pad 2? Gamers, content creators, and anyone prioritizing raw performance. Who should buy the Xiaomi Pad 5? Users seeking a well-rounded tablet for media consumption, light productivity, and a more affordable price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The Oppo Pad 2 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset.
❓ Is the Xiaomi Pad 5 worth buying in 2024?
Yes, the Xiaomi Pad 5 remains a compelling option in 2024, especially for those seeking a well-rounded tablet at a competitive price.
❓ Does the Oppo Pad 2 support a stylus?
Yes, the Oppo Pad 2 supports a stylus, although it's typically sold separately.
