The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K9x and Xiaomi Poco X5 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an attractive price point, but which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 edges out the K9x thanks to its superior display brightness, impressive battery life, and slightly faster charging. While the K9x's Dimensity 810 offers decent performance, the Poco X5 provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 23 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | PGCM10 | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 106h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 400895 (v9)
GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
Oppo K9x
- Potentially better gaming performance (Dimensity 810)
- Reverse wired charging
- Competitive price
- Unknown display brightness
- Unconfirmed battery life
- Likely inferior camera compared to Poco X5
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Exceptional battery life (106h endurance)
- Faster charging (100% in 60 min)
- Generally smoother performance
- Snapdragon 695 5G might be slightly less powerful for demanding games
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 728 nits, significantly brighter than the K9x (specs unavailable, assumed lower). Its 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The K9x's display is likely adequate but won't match the Poco X5's visual punch.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Based on general reviews, the Poco X5 likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall camera quality, offering more consistent results. The K9x's camera is likely adequate but may struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Oppo K9x's Mediatek Dimensity 810 is a capable chip, particularly for gaming. However, the Xiaomi Poco X5's Snapdragon 695 5G offers a slightly more efficient and generally smoother experience for everyday tasks and multitasking. Both use 6nm process, so efficiency is comparable.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 shines with an endurance rating of 106 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The K9x's battery capacity is unknown, but the Poco X5's longevity is a significant advantage. The Poco X5 also charges slightly faster (60 min vs 27 min for 50% on the K9x).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9x? Users prioritizing gaming performance on a tight budget might find the Dimensity 810 appealing. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X5? Those seeking a vibrant display, long-lasting battery, and a generally smoother user experience will appreciate the Poco X5.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo K9x's Dimensity 810 might offer a slight edge in some games, but the Poco X5's Snapdragon 695 5G is still capable and provides a smoother overall experience.
❓ How does the charging speed compare?
The Poco X5 charges faster, reaching 100% in 60 minutes, while the K9x takes longer (27 minutes for 50%).
