Oppo K9x vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G edges out the Oppo K9x thanks to its superior Snapdragon 780G chipset, brighter display, and generally more refined overall experience. However, the K9x offers a competitive price and decent performance for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9x | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 23 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | PGCM10 | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9x
- Affordable price
- Large battery capacity
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Dimmer display
- Potentially less refined camera
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 780G chipset
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
- Premium design
- Excellent battery optimization
- Slightly higher price
- Battery capacity slightly smaller than K9x
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (846 nits peak) compared to the Oppo K9x, offering better visibility in sunlight. While both have excellent contrast ratios, the Mi 11 Lite 5G's AMOLED panel likely provides more vibrant colors and deeper blacks. The K9x's display is still good, but doesn't match the premium feel of the Mi 11 Lite 5G.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G generally delivers better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Snapdragon 780G's image signal processor (ISP) contributes to improved processing and dynamic range. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G likely has more advanced features and better video stabilization.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G's Snapdragon 780G chipset (5nm) provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo K9x's Dimensity 810 (6nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Mi 11 Lite 5G. The K9x is capable for everyday tasks, but may struggle with demanding games or heavy workloads.
Battery Life
The Oppo K9x has a slightly larger battery capacity, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G's endurance rating of 106h suggests excellent battery optimization. Both support 33W fast charging, allowing for relatively quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K9x is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and a large battery for extended use. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is better suited for those who value a premium design, smoother performance, a brighter display, and a more versatile camera system.