The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we pit the budget-friendly Oppo K9x against the premium vivo X50 Pro+ in a head-to-head comparison. We'll break down their specs, performance, and features to help you decide which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X50 Pro+ is the clear winner for performance and camera quality thanks to its Snapdragon 865 and advanced optics. However, the Oppo K9x offers excellent value for money with a capable chipset and fast charging. Choose the X50 Pro+ if budget isn't a concern; the K9x is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 23 | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, July 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, eco leather back or glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 158.5 x 73 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 192.2 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 32-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min
Reverse wired | 44W wired, 62% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Blue, Brown |
| Models | PGCM10 | V2011A |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 93h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 621433 (v8)
GeekBench: 3411 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9x
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 33W charging
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset than flagship phones
- Likely LCD display (lower brightness/color accuracy)
- Camera not as advanced as flagship models
vivo X50 Pro+
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 5G chipset
- Exceptional camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Impressive battery life (93h endurance rating)
- Higher price point
- Older model (may lack latest features)
- Battery may have degraded over time (being an older device)
Display Comparison
Both phones boast impressive displays with a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The X50 Pro+ likely has a higher resolution and potentially a more advanced panel (likely AMOLED) offering better brightness and color accuracy compared to the K9x (likely LCD). The X50 Pro+ also likely has a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X50 Pro+ shines in the camera department. Its flagship-grade camera system likely includes a larger sensor, advanced image processing, and features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for sharper photos and videos. The Oppo K9x offers a competent camera setup, but it can't compete with the X50 Pro+'s capabilities, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The vivo X50 Pro+’s Snapdragon 865 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Oppo K9x’s Dimensity 810. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the X50 Pro+. The Dimensity 810 is still capable for everyday tasks, but it won't handle demanding games as well.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the vivo X50 Pro+ boasting an endurance rating of 93 hours. The Oppo K9x, while not explicitly stated, likely provides all-day battery life. The Oppo K9x's 33W charging is competitive with the X50 Pro+'s 44W, offering relatively fast charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9x? Users seeking a reliable, affordable smartphone with decent performance and fast charging. Who should buy the vivo X50 Pro+? Photography enthusiasts and power users who demand top-tier performance, a premium design, and a flagship camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K9x good for gaming?
The Oppo K9x can handle casual games, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings for smooth gameplay. The vivo X50 Pro+ is significantly better for gaming.
❓ Which phone has better camera quality?
The vivo X50 Pro+ has a superior camera system with better image quality, especially in low light. It offers more advanced features and a higher-resolution sensor.
