The Oppo K series consistently delivers impressive value in the budget smartphone market. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Oppo K9x and the Oppo K10x. Both offer compelling features, but which one truly comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K10x emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging, a more efficient chipset, and generally improved performance. While the K9x is a decent option, the K10x’s upgrades justify its likely slightly higher price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 23 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Blue, Black |
| Models | PGCM10 | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Oppo K9x
- Potentially slightly larger display
- Decent performance for the price
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset
- May lack 5G in some regions
Oppo K10x
- Faster 67W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Likely better image processing
- Potentially slightly smaller display
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD panels, potentially around 6.5-6.7 inches with a 120Hz refresh rate. The K9x might have a marginally larger display, but the K10x could offer slightly better color accuracy. Expect FHD+ resolution on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with a main 48MP or 64MP sensor on both. However, the K10x's more powerful processor could lead to better image processing and low-light performance. Expect decent results from both, but the K10x has the potential for slightly better photos.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the K10x holds a significant advantage over the Dimensity 810 in the K9x. The Snapdragon offers better efficiency and generally smoother performance in everyday tasks and gaming. The K9x is still capable, but the K10x will feel snappier.
Battery Life
The K10x's 67W charging is a game-changer compared to the K9x's 33W. This translates to significantly faster charging times, a crucial factor for many users. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the K10x's faster charging makes it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9x? Users prioritizing a slightly larger screen and are less concerned about charging speed or top-tier performance. Who should buy the Oppo K10x? Those seeking faster charging, better overall performance, and a more modern chipset, even if it means a slightly smaller display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K10x worth the extra money?
Yes, the faster charging and improved performance of the K10x generally justify the slightly higher price. It offers a more modern and enjoyable user experience.
❓ Does the Oppo K9x support 5G?
It depends on the specific region and variant. Some versions of the K9x may not have 5G connectivity.
