Looking for a budget-friendly Oppo phone? The K9x and A56s both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one is the right fit for your budget and lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K9x is the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging (33W vs 10W) and likely better overall features for the price. While the A56s is a decent option, the K9x provides a more modern and convenient experience, especially for those valuing quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 23 | 2023, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min
Reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | PGCM10 | PFTM20 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oppo K9x
- Faster 33W Charging
- Potentially Better Camera
- Slightly More Premium Design
- Likely Better Thermal Management
- Potentially Higher Price
- May lack some features found in higher-end Oppo phones
Oppo A56s
- Lower Price Point
- Decent Performance for Basic Tasks
- Reliable Brand
- Slow 10W Charging
- Likely Inferior Camera
- Less Premium Build Quality
- Older Software
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely LCD) and resolution, though the K9x might have a slightly higher refresh rate or better color accuracy. We'll need to confirm specific display specs for a definitive comparison. Expect around 6.5-6.6 inch displays.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely have a triple-camera setup, the K9x is expected to have a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms, resulting in slightly better photo and video quality. Expect a 48MP main camera on both, but the K9x may have a wider aperture.
Performance
Both devices share the same Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset, meaning performance in everyday tasks and gaming will be very similar. However, the K9x might have slightly better thermal management due to potentially improved cooling solutions.
Battery Life
The A56s likely has a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh) to the K9x, but the K9x's 33W fast charging is a massive advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the A56s' 10W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9x? Users prioritizing fast charging, a slightly more premium feel, and potentially better camera capabilities. Who should buy the Oppo A56s? Those on an extremely tight budget who are willing to compromise on charging speed and potentially other features for a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K9x worth the extra money compared to the A56s?
Yes, if fast charging and a potentially better camera are important to you. The K9x offers a significantly improved charging experience and likely better image quality for a relatively small price increase.
❓ What chipset do both phones use?
Both the Oppo K9x and Oppo A56s utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset, ensuring similar performance for everyday tasks.
