The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K9s and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro are two strong contenders. Both pack the capable Snapdragon 778G chipset, but differ significantly in other areas. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging, brighter display, and generally more polished software experience. While the Oppo K9s offers a competitive price, the Poco X5 Pro's advantages make it the better overall choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | PERM10 | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | - | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9s
- Large Display
- Competitive Price
- Decent Performance
- Slower Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Less Refined Software
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Fast 67W Charging
- Brighter Display
- Refined Software (MIUI)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slightly Higher Price
- Camera can sometimes be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display, but the Poco X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 912 nits, significantly brighter than the K9s. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Poco X5 Pro also has a reported infinite contrast ratio, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While both have a 120Hz refresh rate, the Poco X5 Pro's superior brightness gives it a noticeable edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones offer versatile camera setups, the Poco X5 Pro generally delivers better image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Poco X5 Pro's image processing tends to be more natural, while the Oppo K9s can sometimes produce oversaturated images. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, ensuring smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization plays a crucial role. Xiaomi's MIUI (on the Poco X5 Pro) is generally considered more refined and feature-rich than Oppo's ColorOS, potentially leading to a slightly smoother user experience. Both phones have 8GB of RAM and ample storage options.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Oppo K9s also offers decent battery life, it doesn't quite match the Poco X5 Pro. The biggest difference lies in charging speed: the Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging can fully charge the phone in just 45 minutes, while the Oppo K9s is limited to 30W.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K9s is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a large display and don't mind slower charging. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is ideal for users who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more feature-rich software experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer good gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 778G. However, the Poco X5 Pro's potentially better thermal management and software optimization might give it a slight edge in sustained performance.
❓ Is the Oppo K9s worth buying if I'm on a tight budget?
Yes, the Oppo K9s remains a viable option if you're looking for a large display and decent performance at a lower price point. Just be aware of the slower charging and less vibrant display compared to the Poco X5 Pro.
