Oppo K9s vs Oppo Find X5 Lite: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 Lite emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging (65W vs 30W), more powerful chipset (Dimensity 900), and potentially better camera capabilities. While the K9s offers a solid Snapdragon 778G, the Find X5 Lite's overall package is more premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9s | Oppo Find X5 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | PERM10 | CPH2371 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9s
- Solid Snapdragon 778G performance
- Good value for money
- Decent battery life
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 30W charging
- Potentially less advanced camera
- Less premium design
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Faster 65W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- Potentially better camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Higher price
- Battery life, while good, not significantly better than K9s
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, likely AMOLED panels with excellent color reproduction. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests deep blacks and high dynamic range. The Find X5 Lite might have a slightly brighter display, but detailed reviews are needed for a definitive comparison. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed, but the Find X5 Lite is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The K9s likely features a 64MP main sensor, while the Find X5 Lite may have a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. Low-light performance and video recording are areas where the Find X5 Lite is likely to excel.
Performance
The Oppo Find X5 Lite's MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset generally outperforms the Snapdragon 778G in the K9s, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. While both are capable of handling everyday use and moderate gaming, the Find X5 Lite offers a smoother and more responsive experience. The Dimensity 900's architecture also tends to be more efficient.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (123h), suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Find X5 Lite's 65W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in around 31 minutes, compared to the K9s's 30W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K9s is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a capable processor for everyday tasks and gaming, and don't mind slower charging. The Oppo Find X5 Lite is for those willing to spend a bit more for faster charging, a potentially better camera, and a more premium feel.