Oppo K9s vs OnePlus Nord N300: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K9s edges out the Nord N300 thanks to its superior Snapdragon 778G chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks. While the Nord N300 boasts impressive battery life, the K9s's faster charging and stronger processor make it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9s | OnePlus Nord N300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 20 | 2022, October 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, November 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, OxygenOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Aurora | Midnight Jade |
| Models | PERM10 | CPH2389 |
| Price | - | About 230 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1506:1 (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335440 (v9) GeekBench: 1780 (v5.1) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9s
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Likely Higher Refresh Rate Display (120Hz)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Battery life not as exceptional as Nord N300
- Camera specs less detailed
- Design may be less premium
OnePlus Nord N300
- Exceptional Battery Life (114h Endurance Rating)
- Brighter Display (623 nits)
- Reliable Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Clean OnePlus Software Experience
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 810)
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Lower Refresh Rate Display (60Hz)
- Camera system less advanced
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a 1506:1 contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. However, the Nord N300 boasts a measured peak brightness of 623 nits, which is significantly higher than what's typically reported for the K9s (likely around 480-500 nits). This means the Nord N300 will be easier to see in direct sunlight. The K9s likely has a slightly higher refresh rate (120Hz) compared to the Nord N300 (60Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully available for the K9s, but it's generally expected to have a 64MP main sensor. The Nord N300 features a 64MP main camera, a 2MP depth sensor, and a 2MP macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the K9s might offer slightly better dynamic range and low-light performance due to its more advanced image processing capabilities. Video recording capabilities are likely similar on both devices.
Performance
This is where the Oppo K9s truly shines. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Dimensity 810. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the K9s. The K9s's CPU configuration also offers a slight edge in multi-core performance.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord N300 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The Oppo K9s, while not as long-lasting, supports 30W wired charging, which is faster than the Nord N300's 33W charging. Both phones have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh).
Buying Guide
The Oppo K9s is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming. If you're a heavy gamer or frequently use resource-intensive apps, the K9s is the better choice. The OnePlus Nord N300 is perfect for those who value long battery life and a smooth, reliable experience for everyday tasks like browsing and social media.