The Oppo K9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging implementations, making a direct comparison crucial for informed buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Oppo K9 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 768G chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s slightly faster advertised full charge time and potentially wider availability in India are key considerations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 06 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | PEXM00 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo K9
- More powerful Snapdragon 768G chipset for better performance.
- Faster overall charging time (35 minutes to 100%).
- Potentially better gaming experience due to superior processing power.
- Availability may be limited depending on region.
- Battery life may be slightly lower due to the more power-hungry chipset.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Potentially wider availability in the Indian market.
- Slightly faster advertised initial charging speed (50% in 15 minutes).
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset compared to the 768G.
- Slower overall charging time (42 minutes to 100%).
- May struggle with demanding games and applications.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, based on its positioning, may feature a higher resolution display. The absence of refresh rate data prevents a definitive statement, but 120Hz is a common feature in this segment. Color accuracy and peak brightness will be key differentiators, requiring independent testing.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications beyond the presence of sensors, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is known for its 108MP main sensor (not in provided data, but a key feature). The Oppo K9’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor size and image processing algorithms. Lens aperture and the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) are crucial factors, but remain unknown. The absence of details prevents assessing low-light performance or video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K9’s Snapdragon 768G (7nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores – compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The 7nm process node of the 768G, while older, is offset by the higher clock speeds and core architecture, resulting in superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 6nm process of the 695 offers better efficiency, but doesn't compensate for the architectural differences. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Oppo K9.
Battery Life
Both devices feature fast charging, with the Oppo K9 offering 65W wired charging (100% in 35 min) and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasting 67W wired charging (advertised 100% in 42 min). While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G advertises a slightly longer full charge time, it also claims 50% charge in 15 minutes, potentially offering a quicker initial boost. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 768G’s slightly higher power consumption may be offset by optimized software on the Oppo K9. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns and software optimization.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K9 if you need a phone that can handle demanding games and applications with ease, and value a quicker overall charging experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize a potentially more readily available device in the Indian market and appreciate the convenience of a slightly faster advertised full charge, even if it comes with a performance trade-off.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for high-end gaming. While you can likely run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve a playable frame rate. The Oppo K9’s Snapdragon 768G will provide a much smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much of a difference will the 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 make in real-world battery life compared to the 7nm Snapdragon 768G?
The 6nm process node is more efficient, meaning the Snapdragon 695 will consume less power for the same task. However, the difference in real-world battery life will likely be marginal, potentially around 5-10%, and heavily dependent on software optimization and usage patterns. The Oppo K9’s faster charging may mitigate any slight battery life disadvantage.
❓ Does the Oppo K9 support VoLTE/VoWiFi on all major Indian carriers?
This information is not provided in the specifications. It's crucial to verify carrier compatibility before purchasing, as VoLTE/VoWiFi support varies by region and carrier. Check Oppo's official website or contact your carrier for confirmation.
