The Oppo K9 and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to performance and features. The K9 prioritizes raw processing power with its Snapdragon 768G, while the Mi 11 Lite focuses on a sleek design and a bright display, backed by a respectable Snapdragon 732G.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Oppo K9 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 768G offers a significant performance uplift over the Mi 11 Lite’s 732G, coupled with faster 65W charging. However, the Mi 11 Lite remains a strong contender for those valuing a brighter display and a lighter form factor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 06 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 11 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Boba Black (Vinyl Black), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue) |
| Models | PEXM00 | M2101K9AG, M2101K9AI |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 221.40 / € 106.34 |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 290172 (v8), 294251 (v9)
GeekBench: 1796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 768G processor
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (35 minutes to full)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Display brightness likely lower than Mi 11 Lite
- No detailed display specifications available
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Brighter 826 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Good battery endurance (100h rating)
- Slower Snapdragon 732G processor
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 826 nits, making it more visible outdoors. While the Oppo K9’s display specs aren’t provided, the Mi 11 Lite’s high peak brightness is a clear advantage for sunlight readability. The Mi 11 Lite also features an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, though this is a marketing term. The lack of refresh rate information for the K9 suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Mi 11 Lite’s panel is known for its smooth visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the focus should be on image processing. Xiaomi’s image processing tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer, focusing instead on all-around capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo K9’s Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) represents a substantial performance leap over the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite’s Snapdragon 732G (8 nm). The 768G’s Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.8 GHz, provides a significant boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 768G also features a more powerful GPU, translating to higher frame rates in games. The 8nm process of the 732G is more efficient, but the architectural improvements and higher clock speeds of the 768G outweigh this advantage. The K9 is the clear winner for users who prioritize performance.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo K9 and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the K9’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The Mi 11 Lite’s 33W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach 100%. This faster charging speed gives the K9 a practical advantage, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K9 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and value fast charging speeds. It’s ideal for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite if you prefer a more portable device with a vibrant display, and prioritize aesthetics and a comfortable in-hand feel. It’s a great choice for media consumption and everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 768G in the Oppo K9 powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 768G is a capable processor for Genshin Impact and other demanding games. While it won't deliver the highest possible settings, it can provide a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience at medium to high settings, especially considering its efficient thermal design.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite compare to other phones in its price range?
33W charging is relatively standard for phones in this price bracket, but it's noticeably slower than the 65W charging on the Oppo K9. Expect a full charge to take around 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours with the Mi 11 Lite, while the K9 can fully charge in just 35 minutes.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite support HDR10 video playback?
Yes, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite does support HDR10 video playback, enhancing the viewing experience with wider color gamut and improved contrast when streaming compatible content from platforms like Netflix and YouTube.
❓ Is the Oppo K9 a good choice for users who frequently multitask?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 768G’s octa-core CPU and ample RAM (spec not provided, but likely 6GB or 8GB) allow for smooth multitasking, handling multiple apps and background processes without significant slowdown.
