Oppo K9 vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is significantly quicker than the K9’s 65W. However, the K9 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9 | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 06 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 11 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | PEXM00 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9
- Potentially lower price point
- Solid gaming performance for the price
- 65W fast charging is still respectable
- Older Snapdragon 768G chipset
- Likely less refined camera system
- Display brightness likely lower than Nord 2T
OnePlus Nord 2T
- More powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Faster 80W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Generally higher price
- OxygenOS can be divisive (software preference)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 636 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo K9. This difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility. While both displays are likely to have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on higher-end phones, but both likely offer a 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord 2T may have a slight edge. OnePlus typically invests more heavily in camera software and processing. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either phone is concerning, suggesting reliance on electronic image stabilization, which can introduce artifacts. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera on either device is questionable; image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s MediaTek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, offers a more modern architecture than the Oppo K9’s Snapdragon 768G (7nm). The Dimensity 1300’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, provides a significant uplift in CPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 768G’s Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.8 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both phones likely feature ample RAM, the Dimensity 1300’s integrated GPU offers superior graphics performance, benefiting gaming and demanding applications. Thermal management will be key; the 6nm node of the Dimensity 1300 *should* offer better efficiency.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo K9 and OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD support is significantly faster than the K9’s 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in approximately 35 minutes for the K9 versus a faster time for the Nord 2T. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K9 if you need a capable gaming phone on a tighter budget and value a slightly more streamlined software experience. Its Snapdragon 768G provides solid performance for most titles. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prioritize overall performance, faster charging speeds, and a brighter display, even if it comes at a slightly higher price point. The Nord 2T is ideal for users who multitask heavily and demand a responsive experience.