The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K9 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different user priorities. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to determine which phone comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and wireless charging. While the K9 Pro boasts incredibly fast 60W wired charging, the Poco's overall package delivers a more premium and powerful experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Black, White |
| Models | PEYM00 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Incredibly fast 60W wired charging
- Competitive price
- Decent performance for the price
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F5 Pro
- Lower display brightness
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Wireless charging support
- Excellent battery life
- Slightly higher price
- Camera details are unclear
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a clear winner. Its 1059 nits peak brightness significantly outshines the K9 Pro, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio, while nominally infinite, suggests excellent black levels and vibrant colors on the Poco. The K9 Pro's display is still good, but lacks the same punch and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Poco F5 Pro likely holds an edge due to the Snapdragon's superior image processing capabilities. Expect better dynamic range, more accurate colors, and improved low-light performance. Specific camera specs are missing, but the chipset advantage suggests a better overall camera experience on the Poco.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a substantial upgrade over the K9 Pro's Dimensity 1200. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The K9 Pro is still capable, but the Poco offers a flagship-level experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Poco F5 Pro boasting an impressive 99h endurance rating. The K9 Pro's 60W wired charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 16 minutes. The Poco F5 Pro's 67W wired charging is also fast (50% in 15 min), and the addition of 30W wireless charging provides added convenience.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9 Pro? Users prioritizing incredibly fast wired charging and a slightly more budget-friendly price. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro? Those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K9 Pro good for gaming?
The K9 Pro can handle most games, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The Poco F5 Pro offers a significantly better gaming experience due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support fast charging?
Yes, the Poco F5 Pro supports 67W wired charging and 30W wireless charging, allowing for quick top-ups.
