Oppo K9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Oppo K9 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 778G in the A73 5G, and the 60W charging is significantly faster than Samsung’s 25W offering. However, Samsung’s software and brand recognition remain strong considerations.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | PEYM00 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Significantly faster 60W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Superior multi-core performance for demanding tasks
- Software experience may not be as refined as Samsung’s
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Polished Samsung One UI software experience
- Strong brand recognition and ecosystem
- Potentially better display color accuracy
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Lower multi-core performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a top-tier display, but both utilize 6nm chipsets which help with thermal management during extended use. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) aren't provided, the A73 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles. However, the K9 Pro’s focus on performance suggests a display tuned for responsiveness, which could be advantageous for gaming. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't present, impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the A73 5G will likely emphasize Samsung’s image processing algorithms for vibrant, shareable photos. The K9 Pro, geared towards performance, may prioritize speed in image capture. Sensor size is crucial; a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The absence of information on sensor sizes makes it difficult to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both phones will include standard wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, but the quality of these will vary significantly. The A73 5G may benefit from Samsung’s software optimizations for image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo K9 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) versus the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 1200’s CPU configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a clear advantage in multi-core performance compared to the A73’s 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in graphically intensive games. While both use 6nm fabrication, the Dimensity 1200’s more powerful cores give it an edge. The K9 Pro’s performance advantage will be most noticeable to gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Oppo K9 Pro’s 60W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 16 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s 25W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K9 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up will overwhelmingly prefer the K9 Pro. The A73 5G’s slower charging means longer periods tethered to an outlet.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K9 Pro if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or frequent multitasking, and value incredibly fast charging. You’ll benefit from the superior processing power and quicker top-ups. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a wider ecosystem of accessories, and a generally more refined user interface, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance and charging speed.