Oppo K9 Pro vs. Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 Pro 5G edges out the K9 Pro thanks to its slightly faster charging, refined design, and potentially improved camera software. However, the K9 Pro offers excellent performance for the price, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9 Pro | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | RGB notification lights around the camera island | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | PEYM00 | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 400 EUR |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Excellent performance for the price
- Fast 60W charging
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Competitive price point
- Potentially less refined camera software
- Design may be less premium than Reno7 Pro
- No official IP rating
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Faster 65W charging with reverse wired support
- Potentially better camera performance and software
- More premium design and build quality
- Slightly improved sustained performance (Dimensity 1200 Max)
- Higher price point
- Performance gains over K9 Pro are marginal
- May not appeal to hardcore gamers seeking absolute maximum performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. The Reno7 Pro 5G likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Oppo's display tuning, but the difference is minimal. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Reno7 Pro 5G is expected to have a more refined camera system with improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance. While the K9 Pro has a capable 64MP main camera, the Reno7 Pro 5G's software optimizations and potentially a slightly better sensor are likely to give it an edge. Both likely feature ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
While both utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset, the Reno7 Pro 5G boasts the 'Max' variant, which typically offers slightly improved thermal management and sustained performance. The K9 Pro's CPU configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is slightly different than the Reno7 Pro's (Octa-core 3.0 GHz), but real-world performance differences are likely minor. Gaming performance should be comparable.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Pro 5G has a clear advantage with its 65W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in approximately 31 minutes. The K9 Pro's 60W charging is still fast, but takes slightly longer (around 16 minutes for 50%). Battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500mAh on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K9 Pro is ideal for gamers and users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging on a tighter budget. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is better suited for those who value aesthetics, a more polished camera experience, and a slightly more premium feel, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.