Choosing the right smartphone can be overwhelming. Oppo offers a range of devices catering to different budgets and needs. Today, we're pitting the newer, more powerful Oppo K9 Pro against the older, but still capable, Oppo F11 Pro to see which one comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K9 Pro is the clear winner for performance and charging speed thanks to its Dimensity 1200 chipset and 60W charging. However, the F11 Pro boasts exceptional battery life and a strong display, making it a compelling choice for users prioritizing longevity and outdoor visibility. It depends on your priorities!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - V3 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2019, March. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 161.3 x 76.1 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Thunder Black, Aurora Green |
| Models | PEYM00 | CPH1969, CPH2209, CPH1987 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 320 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 109h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1392:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 150218 (v7)
GeekBench: 6020 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Significantly faster performance
- 60W fast charging
- Likely better camera quality
- Modern chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life than F11 Pro
- May be more expensive
Oppo F11 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (109h endurance)
- Excellent sunlight readability
- More affordable
- Sleek design (typical of F-series)
- Outdated chipset
- Slower charging (20W)
- Lower performance compared to K9 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a respectable display with a contrast ratio of 1392:1 (nominal) and 2.987 (sunlight). The F11 Pro's sunlight readability is particularly noteworthy. However, the K9 Pro likely has a higher resolution and potentially a faster refresh rate (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated), offering a slightly smoother visual experience overall.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the K9 Pro likely has a more advanced camera system. The Dimensity 1200 chipset typically supports better image processing. The F11 Pro's camera is still capable, but the K9 Pro should deliver sharper images, better low-light performance, and potentially more features.
Performance
This is where the K9 Pro truly shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 1200 is significantly more powerful than the Helio P70 in the F11 Pro. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the K9 Pro. The K9 Pro's 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency despite the higher performance.
Battery Life
The F11 Pro holds a significant advantage here. Its endurance rating of 109 hours is exceptional. The K9 Pro, while having a decent battery, doesn't match the F11 Pro's longevity. However, the K9 Pro's 60W charging significantly reduces charging time, offsetting some of the battery life difference.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9 Pro? Gamers, power users, and anyone needing fast charging and a smooth experience. Who should buy the Oppo F11 Pro? Users prioritizing long battery life, excellent sunlight readability, and a more budget-friendly option.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K9 Pro worth the extra cost over the F11 Pro?
If you prioritize performance and fast charging, the K9 Pro is worth the investment. However, if battery life is your top concern and you're on a tighter budget, the F11 Pro remains a solid choice.
❓ What is the difference in chipset performance between the Dimensity 1200 and Helio P70?
The Dimensity 1200 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming capabilities compared to the Helio P70.
