Oppo continues to deliver compelling smartphones at various price points. The Oppo K9 Pro and Oppo A1 Pro represent different segments within their lineup. Choosing between them can be tricky, so we're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K9 Pro offers significantly superior performance thanks to its Dimensity 1200 chipset. However, the Oppo A1 Pro boasts faster charging and a potentially more refined design. For gamers and power users, the K9 Pro wins; for those prioritizing charging speed and a more mainstream experience, the A1 Pro is a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2022, November 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2022, November 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 67W wired, PD, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | PEYM00 | PHQ110 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 1200)
- Potentially better camera system
- Fast Charging (60W)
- May have a less premium design
- Potentially larger and heavier
Oppo A1 Pro
- Faster Charging (67W with PD)
- Potentially more refined design
- More mainstream appeal
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Less versatile camera system
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature AMOLED displays with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals. The K9 Pro may have a slightly larger display and potentially higher peak brightness. We'll need to confirm exact specifications for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
The K9 Pro likely features a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses. The A1 Pro's camera is expected to be competent but not as impressive. Image quality and features will be key differentiators.
Performance
The Dimensity 1200 in the K9 Pro is a clear winner here. It's a flagship-level chipset offering significantly more processing power than the Snapdragon 695 5G in the A1 Pro. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the K9 Pro.
Battery Life
While the K9 Pro has a 60W charger, the A1 Pro's 67W charger and PD support allows it to charge faster, reaching 80% in 30 minutes. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the A1 Pro's charging advantage is notable.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9 Pro? Gamers, power users, and anyone needing a phone with a strong processor for demanding tasks. Who should buy the Oppo A1 Pro? Users prioritizing fast charging, a sleek design, and a more balanced overall experience without needing top-tier performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K9 Pro good for gaming?
Yes, the Oppo K9 Pro's Dimensity 1200 chipset makes it a great choice for gaming, handling demanding titles with ease.
❓ How does the Oppo A1 Pro's charging speed compare to other phones?
The Oppo A1 Pro's 67W charging is very fast, allowing you to reach 80% battery in just 30 minutes, putting it among the fastest charging phones available.
❓ Which phone has better build quality?
While specifics vary, the Oppo A1 Pro is generally expected to have a more premium and refined design.
