Oppo K9 Pro vs OnePlus Nord 2 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G edges out the Oppo K9 Pro thanks to its faster charging, slightly better display brightness, and consistently strong battery life. While the K9 Pro offers a similar chipset, the Nord 2's overall package provides a more polished and user-friendly experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9 Pro | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | PEYM00 | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Fast 60W Charging
- Dimensity 1200 Chipset
- Smooth 90Hz Display
- Potentially Lower Display Brightness
- Camera Consistency Concerns
- Slightly Less Battery Life
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Excellent Battery Life (102h Endurance)
- Faster 65W Charging
- Bright Display (633 nits)
- Consistent Camera Performance
- 'Infinite' Contrast Ratio is Nominal
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. However, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, providing better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the K9 Pro's likely lower brightness. The Nord 2's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent black levels.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both offer versatile camera setups, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G generally receives praise for its consistent image quality and reliable video recording. The K9 Pro's camera is capable, but may exhibit slightly less consistent results. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need further investigation for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Powered by the same MediaTek Dimensity 1200 chipset and CPU configuration, both phones deliver comparable performance in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours. This indicates exceptional longevity. The Oppo K9 Pro's battery life is respectable, but doesn't quite match the Nord 2's endurance. The Nord 2 also has faster charging at 65W (100% in 30 mins) compared to the K9 Pro's 60W (50% in 16 mins).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K9 Pro? Gamers and users prioritizing fast charging speeds might find the K9 Pro appealing. Who should buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G? Those seeking a well-rounded experience with excellent battery life, a bright display, and a smooth user interface will likely prefer the Nord 2.