Motorola Edge 30 Pro vs Oppo K9 Pro: Which Android Flagship Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Motorola Edge 30 Pro is the clear winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset. However, the Oppo K9 Pro offers a very competitive experience at a potentially lower price point, with a respectable Dimensity 1200 and impressively fast 60W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K9 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 26 | 2022, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 73.5 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 60W wired, 50% in 16 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White |
| Models | PEYM00 | XT2201-1 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 475.45 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 80h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 941895 (v9) GeekBench: 3658 (v5.1) GFXBench: 78fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K9 Pro
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Faster wired and wireless charging options
- Likely better camera system with OIS and larger sensor
- Potentially higher price point
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can run hotter under sustained load
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
- Potentially more affordable price
- Respectable performance with Dimensity 1200
- Fast 60W wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Likely less powerful camera system
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Pro features a display capable of reaching 685 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo K9 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls slightly behind in peak brightness given the overall positioning of the device. Both displays boast an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The Motorola’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor use, while the lack of detailed display specs for the Oppo makes a direct comparison difficult beyond assuming a slight disadvantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the Motorola Edge 30 Pro’s flagship positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oppo K9 Pro, while capable, likely prioritizes value over cutting-edge camera technology. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the Motorola likely holds an advantage in image quality and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 30 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) utilizes a 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 prime core, alongside 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 performance cores and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Oppo K9 Pro’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm), featuring a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s 4nm process and newer core architecture provide a significant performance advantage, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. However, the Dimensity 1200 remains a capable performer, and the 6nm process may offer better thermal efficiency under sustained load. The Motorola’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not confirmed for Oppo) further contributes to its performance edge.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 80 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for either device). However, charging speeds differ significantly. The Motorola Edge 30 Pro supports 68W wired charging (0-50% in 15 minutes, 100% in 35 minutes), 15W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging. The Oppo K9 Pro offers 60W wired charging (50% in 16 minutes), but lacks wireless charging capabilities. The Motorola’s faster wired charging and addition of wireless charging provide greater convenience and flexibility, offsetting any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K9 Pro if you need a fast-charging phone with solid performance for everyday tasks and casual gaming, and are looking for a potentially more affordable option. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Pro if you demand the highest possible performance for demanding games and applications, value wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s capabilities.