The Oppo K7 5G and Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver strong performance without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through slightly different approaches, primarily centered around their respective Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. This comparison will dissect the nuances between the Snapdragon 765G powering the K7 and the 768G in the K30 Racing, revealing which phone offers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing emerges as the better choice. The Snapdragon 768G’s higher clock speed provides a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, and its 57-minute full charge time is significantly quicker than the K7’s 30W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 04. Released 2020, August 11 | 2020, May 11. Released 2020, May 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White, Blue, Blue/Red | Mint, Blue, Red, Purple, White |
| Models | A1554 | - |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oppo K7 5G
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Reliable 30W fast charging
- Solid all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Slower CPU and GPU compared to the Redmi K30 5G Racing
- Longer full charge time
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing
- Faster Snapdragon 768G processor for improved performance
- Significantly faster 30W charging (100% in 57 minutes)
- Potentially more customization options with MIUI
- MIUI can include pre-installed bloatware
- Software updates may be less frequent than Oppo
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature similar LCD panels given their market positioning, the data doesn't specify display characteristics. We can infer that both will target a 120Hz refresh rate, common for this segment. The key difference lies under the hood; the chipset's ability to efficiently drive that display. The 768G's more powerful GPU will likely result in smoother frame rates in graphically intensive applications, even at 120Hz.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations targeting the mid-range market. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 768G is slightly improved over the 765G, potentially leading to marginally better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The real-world difference will likely be subtle, and image quality will heavily depend on software tuning.
Performance
The core distinction between these phones is the chipset. The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing boasts the Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G, featuring a prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz. This is a step up from the Oppo K7 5G’s Snapdragon 765G, which has a 2.4 GHz prime core. While both utilize the same Kryo 475 architecture, the higher clock speed of the 768G translates to approximately 5-10% faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world tasks. This difference is most noticeable in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games. Both phones share the same GPU architecture, but the 768G's higher clock speed also benefits graphics performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 30W wired charging, but the implementation differs significantly. The Oppo K7 5G reaches 50% charge in 20 minutes, implying a full charge takes around 60-70 minutes. In contrast, the Redmi K30 5G Racing achieves 100% charge in 57 minutes. This faster charging speed is a significant advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Redmi K30 5G Racing effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K7 5G if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing if you value raw performance, faster charging, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software, which often offers more customization options but can also include pre-installed bloatware.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in gaming performance between the Snapdragon 765G and 768G?
Yes, particularly in demanding titles. The Snapdragon 768G’s higher clock speed provides a noticeable boost in frame rates and smoother gameplay, especially at higher settings. While both chips are capable, the 768G offers a more consistent and enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the Redmi K30 5G Racing's charging compared to the Oppo K7 5G in real-world use?
The Redmi K30 5G Racing charges significantly faster. While the K7 5G takes approximately 60-70 minutes for a full charge, the K30 Racing completes a full charge in just 57 minutes. This 10-15 minute difference can be crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing's MIUI software have a lot of bloatware?
MIUI is known for including pre-installed apps, often referred to as bloatware. While some of these apps can be uninstalled, others cannot. This is a common trade-off with Xiaomi devices, offering extensive customization options in exchange for a less 'clean' software experience.
