Both the Oppo K7 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset, subtle differences in charging capabilities and potential software experiences create a clear distinction for prospective buyers. This comparison dives deep into these nuances to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially a more streamlined software experience, the Oppo K7 5G emerges as the winner. Its 30W charging significantly outperforms the A71 5G UW’s 25W, translating to less downtime. However, Samsung’s brand recognition and software features may appeal to some.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 04. Released 2020, August 11 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White, Blue, Blue/Red | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | A1554 | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 240 EUR | - |
| SAR | - | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K7 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quicker power-ups
- Potentially cleaner software experience
- Competitive price point
- Less established brand recognition
- Display technology potentially inferior to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- Samsung’s One UI software features and ecosystem
- Potentially superior display quality (Super AMOLED)
- Wider carrier compatibility in some regions
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially more software bloat
- May be priced higher than the Oppo K7 5G
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo K7 5G and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW are expected to feature FHD+ displays, though specific panel technology details (like OLED vs. LCD) aren't provided. Given the A71 5G UW’s positioning, it likely utilizes a Super AMOLED panel, known for vibrant colors and deep blacks. The K7 5G, being a more value-focused device, may employ an LCD. While both will offer adequate viewing experiences, Samsung’s potential AMOLED advantage will translate to superior contrast and potentially better outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, Samsung typically emphasizes image processing and software enhancements. The A71 5G UW likely features a more sophisticated camera algorithm, potentially leading to more pleasing images in challenging lighting conditions. The K7 5G may prioritize a more natural look. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro/depth sensors found on both, the quality will hinge on the primary sensor resolution and aperture.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) with the same CPU configuration – an octa-core setup featuring 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means gaming and everyday tasks will perform similarly. However, thermal management could differ based on chassis design and cooling solutions. The K7 5G, being a slightly newer device, *may* benefit from minor software optimizations for sustained performance, but this is speculative without testing. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is the likely standard for both.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but both will likely fall in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The key differentiator is charging speed. The Oppo K7 5G boasts 30W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 20 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is limited to 25W, resulting in a slower charging experience. This 5W difference, while seemingly small, accumulates over time, offering a tangible benefit to K7 5G users who value quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K7 5G if you need rapid charging and a focus on core performance without excessive software bloat. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you prefer Samsung’s One UI, a more established brand ecosystem, and potentially wider carrier compatibility, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo K7 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is a capable chipset for gaming. PUBG Mobile should run smoothly at medium to high settings. However, sustained performance will depend on the phone’s thermal management, and prolonged gaming sessions may lead to some throttling.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
The 'UW' designation in the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW indicates support for Ultra Wideband 5G, which utilizes higher frequency bands and carrier aggregation for potentially faster download and upload speeds, *provided* your carrier supports it. Check with your carrier for compatibility.
❓ Is the difference between 25W and 30W charging really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 5W difference is noticeable. While it doesn't sound like much, it translates to roughly 10-15 minutes saved on a full charge. For users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, the Oppo K7 5G’s 30W charging is a significant advantage.
