The Oppo K7 5G and Realme X50 5G represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, but diverge in their approach to charging speed and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Oppo K7 5G edges out the Realme X50 5G. While both offer 30W charging, the K7 5G reaches 50% charge in just 20 minutes, a noticeable advantage over the X50 5G’s 30-minute timeframe to 70%.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 04. Released 2020, August 11 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White, Blue, Blue/Red | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | A1554 | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo K7 5G
- Faster charging speed (50% in 20 minutes)
- Identical Snapdragon 765G performance
- Potentially optimized software experience
- Battery capacity not specified, potentially smaller than X50 5G
- Camera specs unknown, potential for lower image quality
Realme X50 5G
- Identical Snapdragon 765G performance
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Realme’s typically vibrant display
- Slower charging speed (70% in 30 minutes)
- Camera specs unknown, potential for lower image quality
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo K7 5G and Realme X50 5G are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Without specific data on peak brightness, resolution, or color gamut coverage, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Realme historically focuses on vibrant displays, while Oppo often aims for more color accuracy. The absence of LTPO technology means neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specifics on camera sensors and features. However, given the market segment, both phones likely employ a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro lens. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is impossible. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, with Oppo typically favoring a more natural look and Realme leaning towards boosted colors.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration: 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver. This identical processor configuration guarantees comparable CPU performance in everyday tasks and gaming. The performance will be largely dictated by RAM capacity and speed, which are not specified in the provided data. Thermal management will likely be similar, relying on passive cooling solutions given the mid-range positioning.
Battery Life
Both devices support 30W wired charging, but the implementation differs significantly. The Oppo K7 5G achieves a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, indicating a more aggressive charging curve. The Realme X50 5G, while also 30W, takes 30 minutes to reach 70%. This suggests a slower initial charging rate. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the K7 5G is a clear advantage for users who frequently need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K7 5G if you need consistently faster charging and value a quicker path to a usable battery level during short charging windows. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you prioritize maximizing total charge time and potentially benefit from a slightly larger battery capacity (assuming similar usage patterns, not specified in the data).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chipset. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can handle PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. Performance will depend on sustained thermal throttling, which isn't specified for either device.
❓ How does the 30W charging on the Realme X50 5G compare to older, slower charging standards?
30W charging is a significant step up from older 15W or 18W standards. It allows for a much faster initial charge, getting you from 0% to a usable level in a shorter amount of time. However, the Oppo K7 5G’s implementation is demonstrably faster, reaching 50% in 20 minutes compared to the X50 5G’s 30 minutes to 70%.
❓ Are there any known overheating issues with the Snapdragon 765G in either of these phones?
The Snapdragon 765G is generally known to be a thermally efficient chip. However, sustained heavy usage, such as prolonged gaming or video recording, can lead to some throttling. Without specific thermal testing data for these models, it's difficult to say which phone manages heat better.
