Both the Oppo K7 5G and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, but they take different approaches. The K7 5G prioritizes raw processing power with the Snapdragon 765G, while the Nord N10 5G aims for a balanced experience with the Snapdragon 690. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and responsiveness, the Oppo K7 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. However, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G remains a compelling option for those seeking a well-rounded experience with comparable battery life at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 04. Released 2020, August 11 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White, Blue, Blue/Red | Midnight Ice |
| Models | A1554 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 99h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279579 (v8)
GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K7 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 7nm process
- Faster CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Solid battery life (99h endurance rating)
- Measured display brightness and contrast ratio
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 690 chipset
- Slower CPU clock speeds
- May struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio. While these are respectable figures, the Oppo K7 5G’s display specifications are not provided, leaving a gap in direct comparison. However, given the K7 5G’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to assume a similarly competitive display. The Nord N10’s contrast ratio suggests a decent viewing experience, but the K7 5G’s potential display quality remains an unknown factor.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the K7 5G might have a slight edge, potentially offering a more versatile camera system given its focus on overall performance. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests these are likely included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K7 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G (7nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Kryo 475 core clocked at 2.4 GHz. This is a significant step up from the OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s Snapdragon 690 (8nm) with its 2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold cores. The 7nm process node of the 765G generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 8nm 690. This means the K7 5G is likely to sustain higher performance for longer periods, particularly during gaming. The CPU architecture also favors the K7 5G, with a dedicated prime core for peak tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices share a 30W wired charging capability, promising a 50% charge in approximately 20 minutes for the Oppo K7 5G. Interestingly, both phones have an endurance rating of 99 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (which isn't specified). The faster charging on both devices mitigates any concerns about potential capacity differences, ensuring a quick top-up when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K7 5G if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and multitasking without significant slowdown. It’s ideal for users who frequently edit photos/videos or enjoy graphically intensive mobile games. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience with solid battery life and are less concerned with pushing the absolute limits of mobile performance. It’s a great choice for everyday users and media consumers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 690 in the Nord N10 5G handle graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 690 is capable of running these games, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Oppo K7 5G's Snapdragon 765G will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How does the 30W charging compare in real-world usage on both devices?
Both phones advertise a 50% charge in around 20 minutes with 30W charging. However, actual charging times can vary based on factors like battery temperature and background processes. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite potential battery capacity differences, the charging speed effectively addresses battery concerns on both devices.
❓ Is the difference between the 7nm and 8nm process nodes significant for everyday use?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference is minimal. However, during prolonged gaming or video editing, the 7nm Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo K7 5G will run cooler and maintain higher performance for longer, avoiding the throttling that can occur with the 8nm Snapdragon 690.
