Oppo K7 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Which 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and potentially slightly better sustained performance, the Oppo K7 5G is the winner. Its 30W charging significantly outperforms the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W. However, the Moto G 5G Plus offers comparable battery endurance and a solid display, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and a balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K7 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 04. Released 2020, August 11 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White, Blue, Blue/Red | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | A1554 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K7 5G
- Significantly faster 30W charging
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed (potentially marginal gains)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to faster charging cycles
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera specifications are vague
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Excellent 114-hour endurance rating
- Higher peak display brightness (543 nits)
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Slower 20W charging
- CPU clock speed slightly lower than Oppo K7 5G
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a figure the Oppo K7 5G’s display brightness is not specified. This suggests the Moto G 5G Plus will offer better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels given the price point, the brightness advantage gives the Motorola a slight edge for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes a flagship-level camera experience. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution. Image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator, but without sample images, it’s impossible to assess which phone produces more pleasing results.
Performance
Both the Oppo K7 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset. The CPUs are nearly identical, differing only in the prime core clock speed – 2.4 GHz on the Oppo K7 5G versus 2.3 GHz on the Motorola. This 0.1 GHz difference is unlikely to translate to a noticeable real-world performance gap. The thermal management capabilities of each device, however, are unknown. Given the similar hardware, sustained performance will likely depend on the effectiveness of their respective cooling solutions. The Oppo’s faster charging could allow for more frequent top-ups, mitigating any potential throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus claims an endurance rating of 114 hours, a strong indicator of all-day battery life for moderate users. The Oppo K7 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 30W wired charging capability is a significant advantage. This allows for a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W charging is slower, requiring more time to reach a full charge. While the Motorola may offer longer overall runtime on a single charge, the Oppo’s faster charging provides greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K7 5G if you need consistently fast charging and are a power user who frequently tops up their phone throughout the day. This phone is ideal for gamers or those who stream a lot of video. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prefer longer battery life between charges and a more balanced feature set, prioritizing endurance over the absolute fastest charging speeds. It’s a great choice for everyday users who don’t want to be tethered to a charger.