The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Oppo K13x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, they diverge significantly in charging speed, display technology, and overall performance targets. This comparison dissects these differences to help you determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 120W charging, brighter display, and more powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset provide a superior user experience, justifying the potential price premium. However, the K13x remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - K13x | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 - K13x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - K13x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 23 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (Oppo A5i Pro only) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 850 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (only A5i Pro) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunset Peach, Midnight Violet (Midnight Purple), Breeze Blue | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | CPH2753, CPH2821 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | ₹ 10,798 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K13x
- More affordable price point
- Capable Dimensity 6300 chipset for everyday tasks
- Supports multiple charging standards (45W, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD)
- Significantly slower charging speed (45W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Display brightness likely lower than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (full charge in 19 minutes)
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display (1283 nits measured)
- Longer battery life (10:38h active use)
- Higher price compared to the Oppo K13x
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1283 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the K13x. This higher peak brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s superior brightness and potential for higher color accuracy (though not specified) make it the clear winner for media consumption and outdoor use. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on variable refresh rates to conserve battery, but the Redmi’s brighter panel will likely be more impactful.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Xiaomi’s recent focus on high-resolution sensors, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features a more sophisticated camera system. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing capabilities. While the K13x will likely offer acceptable image quality, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Redmi’s processing power will likely enhance these features.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm), featuring a more advanced CPU configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, compared to the Oppo K13x’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm) and its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process node of the 7200 Ultra offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. While both phones feature 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A5xx cores for efficiency, the Redmi’s CPU architecture provides a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The K13x will be adequate for everyday use, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s standout feature is its 120W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oppo K13x’s 45W charging, which takes 37 minutes to reach 50% and significantly longer for a full charge. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts an active use score of 10:38h, the K13x’s battery life is unspecified. The faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage in battery capacity, making it the more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13x if you prioritize a lower price point and still require a capable daily driver for basic tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and noticeably improved performance for demanding applications and gaming, and are willing to pay a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the 4nm process helps with thermal efficiency, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a powerful chipset. Expect some heat during prolonged gaming, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely has adequate thermal management to prevent significant throttling. The K13x's Dimensity 6300 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo K13x slow enough to be a major inconvenience in daily use?
45W charging is still reasonably fast, but it pales in comparison to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W charging. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your phone, the K13x's slower charging could be frustrating. It takes 37 minutes to reach 50% charge, which is a significant wait compared to the Redmi's full charge time of 19 minutes.
❓ How does the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo K13x perform with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 6300 can run Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s Dimensity 7200 Ultra will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more stable performance.
