The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K13 and Nothing Phone (2a) Plus represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The K13 leverages Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus opts for MediaTek's Dimensity 7350 Pro. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Oppo K13 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 chipset, coupled with 80W charging, provides a smoother experience and quicker top-ups. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus excels in display brightness and battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 - China | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76.1 x 8.5 mm (6.43 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | NFC (China only) | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, PD, QC, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 56 min | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Icy Purple, Prism Black, White | Black, Grey |
| Models | CPH2729, PLD110 | A142P |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
Oppo K13
- Faster 80W charging for quick power-ups
- Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 offers efficient performance
- 4nm process node for improved thermal management
- Display brightness likely lower than Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Battery life potentially shorter without capacity details
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Excellent battery life with 16:34h active use score
- High peak display brightness (1097 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Potentially more powerful CPU cores
- Slower 50W charging
- Dimensity 7350 Pro may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 1097 nits. This makes it considerably more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo K13, whose peak brightness isn't specified but is likely lower. While panel technology isn't detailed for either, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus's higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for both, but the Nothing Phone's design language generally emphasizes visual appeal.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without knowing the megapixel count or sensor size for either phone, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a major advantage for capturing sharp photos and stable videos. We can safely assume both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the image processing style will likely differ – Oppo typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Nothing aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The chipset choice is the core of this comparison. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro, with its 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, aims for raw CPU power. However, the Oppo K13’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) utilizes a more efficient architecture – 1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s – potentially leading to better sustained performance and thermal management. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon is key here, offering improved efficiency. While the Dimensity 7350 Pro has a higher clock speed on its prime cores, the Snapdragon’s architecture and process node could translate to a smoother experience during prolonged gaming or multitasking. RAM specifications are missing for both, but LPDDR5x would be a significant benefit.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus claims an impressive 16:34h active use score, indicating excellent battery endurance. The Oppo K13’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 80W wired charging significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging. The Oppo K13 can reach 62% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus takes 56 minutes for a full charge. This faster charging speed could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity on the Oppo K13, providing more convenient top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13 if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps and games without significant throttling, and if rapid charging is a priority. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 offers a performance edge for multitasking and gaming. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility and longer battery life for all-day use, even at the expense of peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7350 Pro in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7350 Pro is a capable chipset, its thermal performance is a concern. Without a robust cooling system, it may experience throttling under sustained load, leading to reduced frame rates. The Oppo K13’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, is likely to manage heat more effectively.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo K13 compared to the 50W charging on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus in real-world use?
The Oppo K13’s 80W charging significantly reduces downtime. Reaching 62% in 30 minutes is a substantial advantage over the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. While both reach 100% in 56 minutes, the initial burst of speed on the Oppo K13 is more practical for quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus support high refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling and animations?
The context data does not specify the refresh rate of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus's display. However, given its focus on user experience, it's highly probable that it supports at least a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate for smoother visuals. The Oppo K13's display refresh rate is also unknown.
