Oppo K13 Turbo vs vivo S18 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo S18 Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads, and its likely superior camera system (based on vivo's brand reputation) offers a more polished photography experience. However, the K13 Turbo remains a strong contender for gamers prioritizing peak CPU performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K13 Turbo | vivo S18 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2023, December 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.29 in) | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, (ultrawide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 1080p@30fps | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple Phantom, Midnight Maverick, White Knight | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PLM110 | V2344A |
| Price | ₹ 23,795 | About 410 EUR |
Oppo K13 Turbo
- Potentially lower price point
- Versatile charging protocol support (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Strong CPU performance for gaming
- Less powerful chipset overall
- Likely inferior camera system
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
vivo S18 Pro
- More powerful Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Likely superior camera performance
- Better sustained performance and thermal management
- Potentially higher price
- Less versatile charging protocol support
- May lack the K13 Turbo's raw CPU gaming power
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and potentially refresh rate. The vivo S18 Pro, being positioned slightly higher, may feature a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone will have adaptive refresh rates for maximum power efficiency, but this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't detail camera specs. However, vivo historically prioritizes camera technology, particularly in its 'Pro' series. We can reasonably expect the S18 Pro to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor, potentially with OIS, and more advanced image processing algorithms. Oppo’s K-series tends to focus more on value, so the K13 Turbo’s camera is likely competent but less feature-rich. The absence of any mention of telephoto lenses suggests neither phone will excel in zoom photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S18 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, a significant upgrade over the K13 Turbo’s Cortex-A725-based setup. While both are 4nm chips, the X3 core offers superior single-core performance, crucial for responsiveness and app loading. The 9200+ also features more powerful Cortex-A715 cores (3x) compared to the K13 Turbo’s A725 cores (3x), translating to better multi-core performance. The K13 Turbo’s four A725 efficiency cores are matched by the S18 Pro’s four A510 cores, but the overall architecture favors the vivo device. This means the S18 Pro will handle demanding tasks and sustained workloads with greater ease, reducing the likelihood of thermal throttling.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 80W wired charging, a significant advantage for quick top-ups. The inclusion of PD, UFCS, and PPS on the K13 Turbo suggests broader compatibility with various chargers, offering flexibility. While battery capacity isn't specified, 80W charging on a typical 4500-5000mAh battery will likely deliver a full charge in under 40 minutes. The S18 Pro’s inclusion of PD is standard, but the lack of UFCS/PPS might limit charging speeds with certain adapters. The real-world impact will depend on battery size, but the K13 Turbo’s charging versatility is a plus.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13 Turbo if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding mobile games and applications, and prioritize maximizing frame rates over all else. Buy the vivo S18 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with a stronger chipset for general use, potentially better camera capabilities, and a more refined software experience. The S18 Pro is the better choice for everyday users and content creators.